Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
Lene Aasdahl1,2, Marius Steiro Fimland3,4,5, Cecilie Røe6,7
1Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, MTFS, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. lene.aasdahl@ntnu.no.
The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale showed poor measurement properties for assessing sick-listed individuals with common mental or musculoskeletal disorders. Its subscales and stages did not effectively predict return to work outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Occupational health
- Psychometrics
- Rehabilitation science
Background:
- The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is utilized to gauge workers' readiness to resume employment post-sick leave.
- Concerns regarding the RRTW scale's underlying constructs and developmental stages have been raised in prior research.
- Validating measurement tools is crucial for accurate assessment in occupational health settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales using Rasch model analysis.
- To determine if Rasch-based scaling enhances the predictive validity of the RRTW scale compared to its conventional application.
- To assess the measurement properties of the RRTW scale in individuals with common mental and musculoskeletal disorders.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up period was conducted.
- 397 individuals on sick leave for musculoskeletal, unspecified, or common mental health disorders undergoing rehabilitation were recruited.
- Rasch analysis was employed to assess the RRTW scale's measurement properties, followed by regression analyses to predict future work participation.
Main Results:
- The RRTW subscales contained insufficient items to adequately represent their intended dimensions, and item fit within subscales was poor.
- A composite variable derived from items fitting together for non-working individuals demonstrated weak predictive power for future work participation.
- Disordered scores across the scale's stages indicated a lack of clear, ordered progression relevant to return to work.
Conclusions:
- The Norwegian version of the RRTW scale exhibits inadequate measurement properties for individuals with musculoskeletal and common mental health disorders.
- Neither the RRTW subscales nor its defined stages demonstrated a significant association with subsequent return to work.
- Further refinement or alternative assessment tools may be necessary for accurately evaluating return to work readiness in this population.
More Related Videos
07:44Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019
11:05SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Nursing Evaluation