Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

603
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
603
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

8.7K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
8.7K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

6.8K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
6.8K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

414
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
414
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

3.9K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
3.9K
Coefficient of Variation01:10

Coefficient of Variation

6.4K
The coefficient of variation measures the dispersion of the data points or distribution around the mean. Using the coefficient of variation, we can compare two data series with drastically different means or different units of measurement. The coefficient of variation for a sample and a population is expressed as a percentage of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Measurement of Time-Dependent CP Violation in the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}μ^{+}μ^{-}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of the Top-Quark Production Cross Section and Charge Asymmetry at LHCb.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Search for Light Pseudoscalar Bosons, Pair-Produced in Higgs Boson Decays in the Four-Electron Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence for Mixing-Induced CP Violation in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψϕ(1020) Decays in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Searches for B^{0}→K^{+}π^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} and B_{s}^{0}→K^{+}K^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence of the B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}π^{+}γ Decay.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

[MS-DTNet: an efficient model combining multi-scale convolution and dual-tower attention for detecting abnormal heart sounds].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2026
Same journal

[A bidirectional feature mapping classification model based on multi-constrained latent representation learning for differential diagnosis of pneumonia].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2026
Same journal

[A Transformer-based multimodal model for predicting hospital-acquired infections using imaging and clinical laboratory data].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2026
Same journal

[Image-guided application of plant pigment patch and laser microdot ablation for surface marking in radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2026
Same journal

[Serum from rats with electroacupuncture activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to improve synaptic plasticity in HT22 neurons with oxygen and glucose deprivation].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2026
Same journal

[Impact of HIV-1 genotypes and population mobility on HIV-1 transmission in Guangzhou: a molecular transmission network analysis].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

[Application of Coefficient for Evaluating Agreement in disordered multi-classification data].

Q Liang1, Z Chen1, Z Zhang1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao = Journal of Southern Medical University
|October 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Coefficient for Evaluating Agreement (CEA) is more robust than the Kappa coefficient for disordered multi-classification data. CEA demonstrates greater stability against variations in sample size and accidental evaluation rates.

Keywords:
AC1 coefficientCoefficient for Evaluating AgreementKappaagreement evaluationdiagnostic test

More Related Videos

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.1K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.1K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Inter-rater reliability is crucial for consistent data interpretation.
  • Traditional metrics like Kappa may have limitations with complex, multi-class data.
  • The AC1 coefficient and its derivative, CEA, offer potential improvements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Coefficient for Evaluating Agreement (CEA) for disordered multi-classification outcomes.
  • To compare CEA's performance against the Kappa coefficient.
  • To assess robustness against varying sample sizes and evaluation rates.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulations and random sampling were employed.
  • Diagnostic test data with varied parameters (sample size, event proportion, evaluation rate, categories) were used.
  • Mean square error, variance, and variance of the mean were compared for Kappa, AC1, and CEA.

Main Results:

  • CEA exhibited greater stability than Kappa, especially with extreme event proportions.
  • Kappa's variance expanded significantly under small samples and inconsistent evaluation rates, unlike CEA.
  • CEA demonstrated a near-normal distribution with large sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • Accidental evaluation rate and sample size significantly impact Kappa, AC1, and CEA.
  • CEA proves more robust to variations in sample size and accidental evaluation rates for disordered multi-classification data.