Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

11:49
Synthesis of Soft Polysiloxane-urea Elastomers for Intraocular Lens Application
Published on: March 8, 2019
12.8K
Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials' Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
Anna Theocharidou1, Konstantinos Tzimas2, Kosmas Tolidis3
1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
|October 18, 2021
Summary
Hydrophilicity in dental impression materials is key for accurate restorations. Polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), polyether, and vinylsiloxanether materials exhibit superior hydrophilicity compared to CAD/CAM materials, with PVS showing the best results.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Surface Chemistry
Background:
- Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is critical for accurate impressions and well-fitting restorations.
- Contact angle measurement is the standard method for assessing material hydrophilicity.
- Understanding material wettability is essential for selecting optimal impression materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the water contact angles of four different elastomeric dental impression materials.
- To evaluate the hydrophilicity of these materials before and during their setting phase.
- To determine the influence of material type on initial and developing hydrophilicity.
Main Methods:
- Flattened specimens of four impression material groups were prepared using a Teflon mold.
- A 5μl droplet of deionized water was applied to each specimen.
- Water contact angles were measured using digital photography at specific time points during setting.
Main Results:
- CAD/CAM impression material exhibited the highest contact angles, indicating hydrophobic behavior.
- Polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), polyether (PE), and vinylsiloxanether materials showed comparable and lower contact angles initially.
- A significant reduction in contact angles (increased hydrophilicity) was observed over time for PVS, PE, and vinylsiloxanether materials, most notably for light-body PVS.
Conclusions:
- CAD/CAM impression materials are the most hydrophobic among those tested.
- PVS materials demonstrate excellent hydrophilicity, crucial for detailed impression capture.
- Polyether and vinylsiloxanether materials offer superior hydrophilicity compared to others, especially during the setting process.
- All tested materials show a progressive increase in hydrophilicity as they set.

