Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

174
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
174
Magical Thinking01:29

Magical Thinking

12
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
12
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving01:17

Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving

822
A parallel-plate capacitor with capacitance C, whose plates have area A and separation distance d, is connected to a resistor R and a battery of voltage V. The current starts to flow at t = 0. What is the displacement current between the capacitor plates at time t? From the properties of the capacitor, what is the corresponding real current?
To solve the problem, we can use the equations from the analysis of an RC circuit and Maxwell's version of Ampère's law.
For the first part of...
822
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

122
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
122
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

213
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
213

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personality traits explain levels of norm compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Phase-dependent stimulation response is shaped by the brain's dynamic functional connectivity.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

How virtual urban green spaces influence stress and risk-taking.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Video games as stimuli in neuroimaging studies: a minireview.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Decision for self and other modulates risk attitude and electrophysiological processing: evidence from a behavioral and electrophysiological experiment.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

ERP correlates of semantic inconsistencies in deepfakes.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

CEST MRI reveals nicotine-induced alterations in glutamate-associated molecular connectivity in the mouse brain.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Brain protein burden is related to intravoxel incoherent motion: PET-MR imaging study.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Screening the optimal rTSMS frequency to orchestrate immune-fibrotic remodeling for adult spinal cord repair.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Assessment of tenecteplase target-associated pathogenic mechanisms underlying depression in acute ischemic stroke patients: insights from artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics analysis and <i>in vitro</i> validation.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Sex-divergent intrinsic brain function in Parkinson's disease: elevated nigral fluctuations and premotor-visuospatial coupling in female patients.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Spatial transcriptomics on an expanded dataset at the brain-electrode interface: exploration of variability and identification of novel biomarkers.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

Additively Combining Utilities and Beliefs: Research Gaps and Algorithmic Developments.

Anush Ghambaryan1,2, Boris Gutkin1,2, Vasily Klucharev1

  • 1Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|October 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores a suboptimal strategy in decision-making where reward value is calculated by adding magnitude and probability. This MIX model offers insights into learning and flexibility with limited neural resources.

Keywords:
MIX modeladditive strategynormalized utilityone-armed bandit taskstate beliefuncertain and volatile environmentvalue-based decision making

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

742

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

742

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Complex environments present challenges for optimal decision-making due to uncertain reward probabilities.
  • Normative frameworks may not fully capture effective learning and behavioral flexibility under neural constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review a suboptimal strategy in value-based decision-making: additively combining reward magnitude and probability.
  • To present the computational details of the MIX model, an algorithmic implementation of this additive strategy.
  • To discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with the MIX model.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on value-based decision-making strategies.
  • Computational modeling of a specific additive strategy (MIX model) for sequential decision-making with two options.

Main Results:

  • The MIX model algorithmically implements an additive strategy for combining reward magnitude and probability.
  • The additive strategy may offer advantages in learning and behavioral flexibility despite being suboptimal by normative standards.

Conclusions:

  • The MIX model provides a framework for understanding a specific suboptimal decision-making strategy.
  • Further research is needed to explore the model's potential and refine it as a general model of value-based choice.