Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

246
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
246
Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

149
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
149
Mnemonic Devices01:23

Mnemonic Devices

203
Mnemonic devices are cognitive tools that facilitate memory retention by linking new information to familiar patterns or organizational strategies. These techniques are beneficial for remembering complex or lengthy sets of information by simplifying and structuring them in easily retrievable ways.
Acronyms
Acronyms are created by using the initial letters of a series of words to form a new word or phrase. This approach condenses complex information into a single, memorable entity. For example,...
203
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

1.2K
Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or...
1.2K
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

337
Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of...
337
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

225
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
225

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive processing of predictions and prediction errors in hippocampal subregions.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same authorSame journal

Item recognition is associated with gut microbiota composition in healthy humans.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Reactivation during sleep segregates the neural representations of episodic memories.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Item recognition is associated with gut microbiota composition in healthy humans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

What Are My Friends Really Like? How We Change Our Perceptions of Familiar Others' Traits and Actions.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Goal orientation shifts attentional focus and impairs reward-motivated memory.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.6K

Mnemonic prediction errors promote detailed memories.

Oded Bein1, Natalie A Plotkin2, Lila Davachi2,3

  • 1Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.

Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
|October 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

When experiences defy expectations, memory updates are crucial. This study shows that prediction errors enhance detailed item memory, improving our understanding of how the brain forms memories.

More Related Videos

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.8K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.6K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.8K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Updating knowledge based on prediction errors is adaptive for accurate world representation.
  • Theoretical models suggest distinct memory traces for prediction errors to prevent interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if mnemonic prediction errors enhance detailed item memory.
  • To determine if strong predictions are necessary for this memory enhancement.
  • To explore whether prediction errors affect gist-based memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned object pairs (A → B) to form expectations.
  • Expectations were violated by replacing the second object (A → C).
  • Item memory tests assessed discrimination between old items and lures.

Main Results:

  • Mnemonic prediction errors significantly enhanced item memory accuracy.
  • Memory enhancement was contingent on intact memory for the original pairs (A → B).
  • Reduced prediction strength prior to violation eliminated the memory advantage.

Conclusions:

  • Prediction errors improve memory for item details, likely via distinct memory traces.
  • Strong prior predictions are essential for leveraging prediction errors to enhance memory.
  • Mnemonic prediction errors selectively enhance detailed memory without increasing gist-based errors.