Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
ARNI versus ACEI/ARB in Reducing Cardiovascular Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction
Jianqing She1,2, Bowen Lou1,2, Hui Liu3
1Cardiovascular Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West 237, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Insights
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy significantly reduced adverse cardiovascular outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients compared to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) therapy. ARNI showed particular benefit in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and younger individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality.
- Standard therapies like angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) are crucial, but further improvements in outcomes are sought.
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) represents a newer therapeutic class with potential benefits in cardiovascular diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term cardiovascular efficacy of ARNI therapy versus ACEI/ARB therapy in patients following acute myocardial infarction.
- To identify specific patient subgroups who may derive maximal benefit from ARNI treatment post-AMI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 7556 AMI patients from January 2016 to December 2020.
- Propensity score matching was employed to create comparable groups for ARNI, ACEI, and ARB treatments.
- Key factors for matching included age, sex, blood pressure, kidney function, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and concomitant cardiovascular medications.
Main Results:
- ARNI therapy was associated with significantly lower rates of composite cardiovascular outcomes compared to both ACEI (HR 0.51, P=0.02) and ARB (HR 0.47, P=0.02).
- ARNI use also led to lower rates of cardiovascular death versus ACEI (HR 0.37, P=0.01) and ARB (HR 0.41, P=0.04).
- Subgroup analyses revealed enhanced benefits of ARNI in patients with LVEF ≤40% and those aged ≤60 years.
Conclusions:
- ARNI therapy demonstrates superior efficacy over ACEI/ARB in mitigating long-term adverse cardiovascular events after AMI.
- Patients with reduced LVEF (≤40%) and younger patients (≤60 years) appear to benefit most from ARNI treatment.
- These findings support the consideration of ARNI therapy in specific AMI patient populations for improved cardiovascular outcomes.
Aims:
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) therapy for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Methods And Results:
Data were collected from the Biobank of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2016 and December 2020. A total of 7556 AMI patients were screened for eligibility. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, blood pressure, kidney function, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and cardiovascular medication were conducted, resulting in 291 patients with AMI being assigned to ARNI, ACEI, and ARB group, respectively. Patients receiving ARNI had significantly lower rates of the composite cardiovascular outcome than ACEI {hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27-0.95], P = 0.02}, and ARB users [HR 0.47, (95%CI, 0.24-0.90), P = 0.02]. Patients receiving ARNI showed lower rates of cardiovascular death than ACEI [HR 0.37, (95%CI, 0.18-0.79), P = 0.01] and ARB users [HR 0.41, (95%CI, 0.18-0.95), P = 0.04]. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with LVEF no more than 40% tend to benefit more from ARNI as compared with ACEI [HR 0.30, (95%CI, 0.11-0.86), P = 0.01] or ARB [HR 0.21, (95%CI, 0.04-1.1), P = 0.05]. Patients aged no more than 60 years exhibited reduced composite endpoints [HR for ARNI vs. ARB: 0.11, (95%CI, 0.03-0.46), P = 0.002].
Conclusions:
In patients with AMI, ARNI was superior to ACEI/ARB in reducing the long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Subgroup analysis further indicates that ARNI is more likely to benefit patients with LVEF less than 40% and aged less than 60 years.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
10:01Improvement of a Closed Chest Porcine Myocardial Infarction Model by Standardization of Tissue and Blood Sampling Procedures
Published on: March 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...