Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Measurement of Pulse Propagation Velocity, Distensibility and Strain in an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Mouse Model
Published on: February 23, 2020
Vascular Deformation Mapping for CT Surveillance of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Growth
Nicholas S Burris1, Zhangxing Bian1, Jeffrey Dominic1
1From the Departments of Radiology (N.S.B., Z.B., J.D., J.Z., B.D.R., C.R.H.), Biomedical Engineering (N.S.B.), and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Z.B., J.D., J.Z.), Center for Molecular Imaging (N.S.B., B.D.R.), and Departments of Cardiac Surgery (I.B.H., T.M.J.v.B., H.J.P.), and Biological Chemistry (B.D.R.), University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, CVC 5588, SPC-5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (G.E.C.); and Imbio, Minneapolis, Minn (C.R.H.).
Abstract:
Background Aortic diameter measurements in patients with a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) show wide variation. There is no technique to quantify aortic growth in a three-dimensional (3D) manner. Purpose To validate a CT-based technique for quantification of 3D growth based on deformable registration in patients with TAA. Materials and Methods Patients with ascending and descending TAA with two or more CT angiography studies between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. The 3D aortic growth was quantified using vascular deformation mapping (VDM), a technique that uses deformable registration to warp a mesh constructed from baseline aortic anatomy. Growth assessments between VDM and clinical CT diameter measurements were compared. Aortic growth was quantified as the ratio of change in surface area at each mesh element (area ratio). Manual segmentations were performed by independent raters to assess interrater reproducibility. Registration error was assessed using manually placed landmarks. Agreement between VDM and clinical diameter measurements was assessed using Pearson correlation and Cohen κ coefficients. Results A total of 38 patients (68 surveillance intervals) were evaluated (mean age, 69 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 21 women), with TAA involving the ascending aorta (n = 26), descending aorta (n = 10), or both (n = 2). VDM was technically successful in 35 of 38 (92%) patients and 58 of 68 intervals (85%). Median registration error was 0.77 mm (interquartile range, 0.54-1.10 mm). Interrater agreement was high for aortic segmentation (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.97 ± 0.02) and VDM-derived area ratio (bias = 0.0, limits of agreement: -0.03 to 0.03). There was strong agreement (r = 0.85, P < .001) between peak area ratio values and diameter change. VDM detected growth in 14 of 58 (24%) intervals. VDM revealed growth outside the maximally dilated segment in six of 14 (36%) growth intervals, none of which were detected with diameter measurements. Conclusion Vascular deformation mapping provided reliable and comprehensive quantitative assessment of three-dimensional aortic growth and growth patterns in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms undergoing CT surveillance. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wieben in this issue.
More Related Videos
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
06:08Ultrasound Imaging of the Thoracic and Abdominal Aorta in Mice to Determine Aneurysm Dimensions
Published on: March 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Thoracic Aorta
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests