Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Minimum Clinically Important Difference: A Metric That Matters in the Age of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Aditya V Karhade1,2, Christopher M Bono1, Joseph H Schwab1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
➤:
As the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is increasingly utilized in orthopaedic research and clinical practice, there is not a consensus regarding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) calculation.
➤:
The varied MCID calculation methods can lead to a range of possible values, which limits the translatability of research efforts.
➤:
The completion rate and follow-up period also influence MCID values and should be reported alongside study results.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Dosage Regimen: Individualization

