Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conduct Disorder01:28

Conduct Disorder

176
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
176
Bullying02:04

Bullying

8.6K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.6K
Oppositional Defiant Disorder01:30

Oppositional Defiant Disorder

198
A persistent pattern of angry or irritable mood, defiant behavior, or vindictiveness characterizes Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Symptoms must occur over at least six months, involve interactions with individuals beyond siblings, and meet specific diagnostic criteria to be clinically significant. The disorder affects emotional regulation, social interactions, and behavior, often manifesting early in life and influencing long-term development and functioning.
Diagnostic Criteria and...
198
Punishment01:27

Punishment

443
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
443
Parenting Styles01:27

Parenting Styles

213
Diana Baumrind's four parenting styles — authoritarian, authoritative, neglectful, and permissive — each influence children's socio-emotional development differently.
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
213
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings01:29

Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings

32
Other adult family members and siblings play a crucial role in shaping children’s social and emotional development. While parents or primary caregivers are often the central figures in early attachment and socialization, other adults in a child’s life, such as grandparents, aunts, and uncles, can significantly influence developmental outcomes. These influences depend on each adult’s personality and may help compensate when a primary caregiver is emotionally distant or...
32

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rejoinder: Spanking and externalizing problems: Examining within-subject associations.

Child development·2021
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Adapting under stress: How sociocultural stress intensity and fluctuation shape youth school engagement and internalizing symptoms.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Children across diverse societies exchange reasons to resolve disagreements.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Beyond resources: Children in India and Germany have a multifaceted concept of fairness.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
07:56

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

10.2K

Spanking and externalizing problems: Examining within-subject associations.

Joshua Pritsker1

  • 1San Diego Mesa College, San Diego, California, USA.

Child Development
|October 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that general spanking did not significantly impact child externalizing behaviors. However, limited spanking, used infrequently and without objects, showed beneficial effects on behavior.

More Related Videos

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

845
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
07:56

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

10.2K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

845
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Child Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Previous research on the effects of spanking on child externalizing behaviors has yielded mixed results.
  • A critical limitation in prior studies may be the failure to adequately differentiate between-subject and within-subject variance.
  • Understanding the nuanced effects of different types and frequencies of physical punishment is crucial for child development research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reanalyze existing longitudinal data to examine the within-subject effects of spanking on externalizing behaviors.
  • To differentiate the impact of general spanking from limited, infrequent spanking on child behavior.
  • To address the methodological challenge of separating between-subject and within-subject variance in behavioral research.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of data from two longitudinal studies involving 585 participants from the Child Development Project.
  • Application of a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model to yearly measurements from ages 6 to 8.
  • Statistical exclusion of causally irrelevant between-subject variance to focus on within-subject effects.

Main Results:

  • After removing between-subject variance, general spanking showed no significant effects on externalizing behaviors (β = .06, .07).
  • Limited spanking, defined as infrequent (≤ once/month) and without objects, demonstrated beneficial effects (β = -.17, -.21).
  • These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between different forms and frequencies of physical punishment.

Conclusions:

  • The study suggests that previous findings on spanking may be confounded by between-subject variance.
  • Limited, infrequent spanking without objects appears to have a positive impact on reducing externalizing behaviors.
  • Future research should carefully distinguish between general physical punishment and specific, limited forms of spanking.