Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
10.0K
Characterizing the in-out asymmetry in visual crowding.
Ramakrishna Chakravarthi1,2, Jirko Rubruck1,3, Nikki Kipling4,5
1School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Journal of Vision
|October 20, 2021
Summary
The in-out asymmetry (IOA) reliably indicates visual crowding, even with varying target locations and attention. This finding helps distinguish crowding from other visual processing interference mechanisms like masking.
Area of Science:
- Visual perception
- Cognitive psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Object processing is hindered by nearby clutter through mechanisms like masking and visual crowding.
- Distinguishing between these interference mechanisms is crucial for understanding visual processing.
- The in-out asymmetry (IOA) has been proposed as a diagnostic marker for visual crowding, but its reliability is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To rigorously investigate whether the in-out asymmetry (IOA) is a definitive indicator of visual crowding.
- To explore the influence of target location, location uncertainty, and attentional allocation on IOA.
- To determine if IOA is specific to crowding or also occurs in other flanker-interference mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Conducted experiments with 38 participants identifying briefly presented peripheral letters.
- Manipulated flanker type (inward vs. outward) and target location (four distinct positions).
- Varied target location uncertainty and attentional allocation using blocking, randomization, and pre-cueing.
- Employed multilevel Bayesian regression analysis to analyze the data.
Main Results:
- Observed a robust in-out asymmetry (IOA) across all tested locations.
- Found that the strength of IOA was significantly modulated by target location, location uncertainty, and attentional allocation.
- The observed IOA patterns were consistent with crowding and not observed in masking.
Conclusions:
- The in-out asymmetry (IOA) serves as a reliable marker for visual crowding.
- IOA's properties are influenced by factors such as attention and location uncertainty.
- These findings support the specificity of IOA for crowding, differentiating it from masking.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
34
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
34
In- and Out-Groups
40.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.8K
Social Facilitation
33.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
33.8K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
309
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
309
Bystander Effect
9.8K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.8K

