Comparison of clinical outcomes after precut DMEK with or without dextran-containing medium compared to standard

Annekatrin Rickmann1, Karl Boden2, Silke Wahl2

  • 1Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Germany. Annekatrin.Rickmann@kksaar.de.

Abstract

Insights

Precut Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using dextran-free or dextran-containing medium shows comparable clinical outcomes to standard DMEK. This pilot study found no graft failures, suggesting viability of both precut DMEK methods.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Corneal Surgery
  • Endothelial Keratoplasty

Background:

  • Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a surgical procedure for endothelial dysfunction.
  • Optimizing tissue preservation and surgical techniques for DMEK is crucial for patient outcomes.
  • Precut DMEK offers potential advantages in surgical efficiency and tissue handling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rates of precut DMEK using two different storage media: dextran-containing and dextran-free.
  • To compare these results against the standard DMEK procedure.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 32 eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy undergoing DMEK.
  • Eyes were divided into four groups: precut DMEK in dextran-containing medium, precut DMEK in dextran-free medium, standard DMEK in dextran-containing medium, and standard DMEK in dextran-free medium.
  • Follow-up was conducted for one year, assessing visual acuity, endothelial cell count, central corneal thickness, and rebubbling rates.

Main Results:

  • All four groups demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, endothelial cell counts, and central corneal thickness.
  • The rebubbling rates were similar across all study groups.
  • No instances of graft failure were observed in any of the participants.

Conclusions:

  • Precut DMEK, utilizing either dextran-containing or dextran-free organ culture medium, yields clinical results comparable to the standard DMEK procedure.
  • These preliminary findings suggest that precut DMEK is a viable alternative with consistent outcomes.
  • Further research may explore the long-term efficacy and broader application of precut DMEK techniques.

Related Concept Videos