Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 14, 2014
N-of-1 Trials in Neurology: A Systematic Review
Bas C Stunnenberg1, Joost Berends2, Robert C Griggs2
1From the Department of Neurology (B.C.S., J.B., B.G.M.v.E.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, and Department of Health Evidence (H.G., G.J.v.d.W.), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (R.C.G.), University of Rochester Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City; University of Groningen (G.D.), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (J.N.), University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia; and Amsterdam UMC (J.R.), University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Netherlands. bas.stunnenberg@radboudumc.nl.
N-of-1 trials are emerging in neurology for various disorders, offering personalized evidence. However, their quality and reporting are suboptimal, requiring adherence to guidelines like CENT for improvement.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Clinical Trials
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- N-of-1 trials, or single-patient crossover trials, are increasingly used in neurologic disorders.
- These trials provide personalized evidence for treatment efficacy.
- A systematic review was conducted to assess their quality and reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review published N-of-1 trials in neurologic disorders.
- To assess the methodologic quality and reporting standards of these trials.
- To identify areas for improvement in future N-of-1 trial design and reporting.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was performed up to December 1, 2019.
- Data extracted included trial design, disease, intervention, analysis, and treatment success.
- Methodologic quality and reporting were assessed using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 criteria and the Jadad score.
Main Results:
- Forty N-of-1 trial reports were identified, primarily in neuromuscular and neurodegenerative/movement disorders.
- Interventions included pharmacologic agents, electric stimulation, and nutritional products.
- Mean CENT and Jadad scores indicated suboptimal methodologic quality and reporting.
Conclusions:
- N-of-1 trials are a valuable, emerging tool in neurology, applicable to both stable and progressive disorders.
- Improving methodologic quality and reporting by following CENT guidelines is crucial for future trials.
- These trials can bridge the gap between research and clinical care by providing personalized Level 1 evidence.
More Related Videos
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
14:47Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...