N-of-1 Trials in Neurology: A Systematic Review

Bas C Stunnenberg1, Joost Berends2, Robert C Griggs2

  • 1From the Department of Neurology (B.C.S., J.B., B.G.M.v.E.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, and Department of Health Evidence (H.G., G.J.v.d.W.), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (R.C.G.), University of Rochester Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City; University of Groningen (G.D.), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (J.N.), University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia; and Amsterdam UMC (J.R.), University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Netherlands. bas.stunnenberg@radboudumc.nl.

Neurology
|October 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

N-of-1 trials are emerging in neurology for various disorders, offering personalized evidence. However, their quality and reporting are suboptimal, requiring adherence to guidelines like CENT for improvement.