Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

809
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
809

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinician decision-making in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: an Australian and New Zealand interdisciplinary survey study.

Pituitary·2026
Same author

Sex differences in vaccine-induced neuraminidase cross-recognition and protection against H5N1 in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Emergence of an antigenically drifted and reassorted influenza B virus at the end of the 2024-25 influenza season.

mBio·2026
Same author

Flowing differently: exploratory characterization of menstrual effluent compared with peripheral blood.

F&S science·2026
Same author

Antibody Transcytosis and Neutralizing Activity in Respiratory Epithelial Cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Ubiquitin ligase ITCH regulates life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

eLife·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

A Rapid, Multiplex Dual Reporter IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assay for a Multiplexed Bead-Based Flow Analysis System
07:08

A Rapid, Multiplex Dual Reporter IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assay for a Multiplexed Bead-Based Flow Analysis System

Published on: April 6, 2021

5.2K

Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2.

Valentin Parvu1, Devin S Gary1, Joseph Mann1

  • 1Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences-Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United States.

Frontiers in Microbiology
|October 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) show 75% sensitivity. Accuracy is higher in symptomatic individuals and early in symptom onset, with viral load being a key factor.

Keywords:
RT-PCRSARS-CoV-2diagnostic accuracymeta-regression analysisrapid antigen testingsystematic review and meta-analysistest sensitivityviral culture

More Related Videos

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
08:48

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

3.0K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Diagnostics with Standardized LAMP
05:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Diagnostics with Standardized LAMP

Published on: September 8, 2023

950

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

A Rapid, Multiplex Dual Reporter IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assay for a Multiplexed Bead-Based Flow Analysis System
07:08

A Rapid, Multiplex Dual Reporter IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assay for a Multiplexed Bead-Based Flow Analysis System

Published on: April 6, 2021

5.2K
Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
08:48

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

3.0K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Diagnostics with Standardized LAMP
05:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Diagnostics with Standardized LAMP

Published on: September 8, 2023

950

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) aid in timely diagnosis and isolation to curb transmission.
  • Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a standard diagnostic method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection tests.
  • To compare antigen test performance against RT-qPCR in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
  • To summarize antigen test sensitivity using meta-regression.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of 83 studies comparing SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-based lateral flow testing (RALFT) with RT-qPCR.
  • Meta-regression analysis to assess factors influencing RALFT sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Overall RALFT sensitivity was 75.0% (95% CI: 71.0-78.0).
  • Sensitivity was higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic individuals.
  • Sensitivity was greatest within 7 days of symptom onset and influenced by viral load, specimen storage, and collection type.

Conclusions:

  • SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests offer a valuable, albeit variable, diagnostic tool.
  • Optimizing testing conditions and understanding influencing factors can improve antigen test performance.
  • Both RALFT and RT-qPCR demonstrate high sensitivity when compared to viral culture.