Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Analysis of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-specific CD8+ T-cells in Rhesus Macaques by Peptide-MHC-I Tetramer Staining
Published on: December 23, 2016
Subtle differences in the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 in rhesus macaques
Vincent J Munster1, Meaghan Flagg1, Manmeet Singh1
1Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Abstract:
The emergence of several SARS-CoV-2 variants has caused global concerns about increased transmissibility, increased pathogenicity, and decreased efficacy of medical countermeasures. Animal models can be used to assess phenotypical changes in the absence of confounding factors. Here, we compared variants of concern (VOC) B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 to a recent B.1 SARS-CoV-2 isolate containing the D614G spike substitution in the rhesus macaque model. B.1.1.7 behaved similarly to D614G with respect to clinical disease and replication in the respiratory tract. Inoculation with B.1.351 resulted in lower clinical scores, lower lung virus titers, and less severe lung lesions. In bronchoalveolar lavages, cytokines and chemokines were up-regulated on day 4 in animals inoculated with D614G and B.1.1.7 but not with B.1.351. In nasal samples, cytokines and chemokines were up-regulated only in the B.1.1.7-inoculated animals. Together, our study suggests that circulation under diverse evolutionary pressures favors transmissibility and immune evasion rather than increased pathogenicity.
Insights
New SARS-CoV-2 variants like B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 were compared in rhesus macaques. The B.1.351 variant showed reduced pathogenicity, suggesting evolution favors transmissibility over increased disease severity.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Comparative Pathology
Background:
- Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) raises global health concerns regarding transmissibility, pathogenicity, and vaccine efficacy.
- Animal models are crucial for evaluating phenotypical changes in SARS-CoV-2 variants, controlling for confounding factors.
- Previous studies have highlighted the D614G substitution's role in increased viral fitness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the pathogenicity and replication of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 against a D614G-containing B.1 isolate.
- To assess the in vivo immune response, including cytokine and chemokine profiles, elicited by these different SARS-CoV-2 strains in a relevant animal model.
- To determine if increased transmissibility or pathogenicity is the primary driver of SARS-CoV-2 evolution.
Main Methods:
- Rhesus macaques were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 isolates: B.1 (D614G), B.1.1.7, and B.1.351.
- Clinical disease, viral replication in the respiratory tract (lungs, nasal swabs), and lung histopathology were assessed.
- Cytokine and chemokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and nasal samples were measured at specific time points post-inoculation.
Main Results:
- The B.1.1.7 variant exhibited clinical disease and respiratory tract replication similar to the D614G B.1 isolate.
- In contrast, B.1.351 inoculation led to lower clinical scores, reduced lung viral titers, and attenuated lung lesions.
- Upregulation of cytokines and chemokines was observed in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for D614G and B.1.1.7, and in nasal samples only for B.1.1.7, but not for B.1.351.
Conclusions:
- The B.1.1.7 variant demonstrates comparable pathogenicity to the D614G B.1 SARS-CoV-2 isolate in rhesus macaques.
- The B.1.351 variant exhibits reduced pathogenicity compared to both D614G B.1 and B.1.1.7 strains.
- SARS-CoV-2 evolution under selective pressures appears to prioritize transmissibility and immune evasion over increased pathogenicity.
More Related Videos
13:13Single-cell Quantitation of mRNA and Surface Protein Expression in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-infected CD4+ T Cells Isolated from Rhesus macaques
Published on: September 25, 2018
07:11Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analyses of Cellular Immune Response in Rhesus Macaques
Published on: April 22, 2010