Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

479
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
479

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chemotherapeutic efficacy of nano formulation capecitabine@SNPs and gamma radiation: a novel metronomic approach for breast cancer treatment.

Drug delivery and translational research·2026
Same author

Phytochemical-mediated green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using Catharanthus roseus and their physicochemical characterization, biological evaluation, and molecular docking analysis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The anti-ulcerative potential of Berberine on the rat model of inflammatory bowel disease.

Journal of molecular histology·2026
Same author

Microbial community assembly and pathogen signatures in groundwater and tap water systems in greater Cairo, Egypt.

The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association·2026
Same author

Hybrid feature selection and classification model using high-dimensional data based on a metaheuristic algorithm for brain cancer diagnosis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Secant Optimization Algorithm for efficient global optimization.

Scientific reports·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

Brain Cancer Prediction Based on Novel Interpretable Ensemble Gene Selection Algorithm and Classifier.

Abdulqader M Almars1, Majed Alwateer1, Mohammed Qaraad2,3

  • 1College of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Yanbu 46411, Saudi Arabia.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a hybrid model for brain tumor classification using feature selection and optimized gradient boosting, achieving high accuracy. The findings link gene expression patterns to tumor types, aiding diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords:
brain cancerclassificationensemble methodsfeature selectiongene expression datagene selectionhyperparameter optimization

More Related Videos

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

9.1K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

643

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

9.1K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

643

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine learning in oncology

Background:

  • Human brain tumors arise from abnormal cell growth, necessitating accurate classification for prognosis and treatment.
  • Cancer microarray data presents challenges due to high dimensionality (many gene expression levels) and limited samples.
  • Existing classification studies often lack biological interpretability of the genes involved.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel hybrid model for brain tumor classification.
  • To integrate feature selection (mRMR) and hyperparameter optimization for gradient boosting classifiers.
  • To bridge the gap between cancer classification accuracy and biological interpretation of implicated genes.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a hybrid model combining Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) feature selection with distributed hyperparameter optimization for gradient boosting.
  • Evaluated the model using Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers.
  • Compared optimized CatBoost and XGBoost performance across multiple cross-validation folds.

Main Results:

  • The optimized CatBoost classifier outperformed optimized XGBoost in AUC, sensitivity, and specificity across several cross-validation folds.
  • Optimized CatBoost achieved 0.91±0.12 accuracy, significantly improving upon the unoptimized version (0.81±0.24).
  • Hybrid algorithms enhanced NB, RF, and SVM accuracy, with SVM and RF reaching 0.97±0.08, surpassing NB (0.91±0.12).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed hybrid model significantly improves brain tumor classification accuracy.
  • Optimized gradient boosting methods, particularly CatBoost, demonstrate superior performance.
  • The study successfully links classification findings to relevant biological insights from gene expression data.