Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

479
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
479
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

304
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
304
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

806
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
806

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological Signatures of Inflammation Biomarkers Identified Using Data Reduction Methods in Adult Population: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Health science reports·2026
Same author

Prognostic value of hyperuricaemia for cardiovascular events in primary care: sex-specific analysis from the IBERICAN cohort.

European journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

Anthropometric Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Menopausal Status: Evidence from the Population-Based Multicentric Study-MCC-Spain.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Influenza Vaccination Coverage and Determinants of New Vaccinations During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain (ENE-COVID): Nationwide Population-Based Study.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2025
Same author

Effect of dietary phenolic compounds intake on mortality in the "Seguimiento Universidad De Navarra" (SUN) Mediterranean cohort.

European journal of nutrition·2025
Same author

Urate Levels as a Predictor of the Prevalence and Level of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: An Identificación de La PoBlación Española de Riesgo Cardiovascular y Renal Study.

Biomolecules·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

Evaluation of Feature Selection Techniques for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.

Nahúm Cueto López1, María Teresa García-Ordás1, Facundo Vitelli-Storelli2

  • 1Department of Electrical, Systems and Automatic Engineering, Universidad of León, Campus de Vegazana s/n, 24071 León, Spain.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|October 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study identifies key breast cancer risk factors using machine learning. Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) achieved the best prediction performance and stability, improving accuracy by 5.8%.

Keywords:
breast cancerfeature selectionrisk prediction modelstability

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Cancer Epidemiology

Background:

  • Breast cancer is a significant public health concern, necessitating improved risk prediction models.
  • Identifying crucial environmental and genetic factors is vital for accurate breast cancer risk assessment.
  • Evaluating the stability and performance of feature selection methods is essential for robust predictive modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the most important factors for breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning.
  • To evaluate and compare the performance and stability of various feature selection techniques.
  • To enhance the accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction models in a healthy population.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset from the MCC-Spain study with 919 cases and 946 controls.
  • Applied and assessed multiple feature ranking and selection algorithms (e.g., SVM-RFE, Random Forest, Relief, wrapper methods).
  • Employed classifiers like Logistic Regression and evaluated model performance using the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) metric.

Main Results:

  • The Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) ranking method demonstrated superior performance.
  • Using the top 47 features selected by SVM-RFE with Logistic Regression yielded an AUC of 0.616, a 5.8% improvement over the full feature set.
  • SVM-RFE and Random Forest exhibited high stability in feature selection, while Relief and wrapper methods were unstable.

Conclusions:

  • SVM-RFE is a highly effective and stable feature selection technique for breast cancer risk prediction.
  • Combining stable feature selection methods with robust classifiers significantly improves predictive model performance.
  • The study highlights the importance of evaluating both stability and performance for reliable cancer risk assessment tools.