Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties
Published on: June 7, 2020
Cost-Normalized Circular Economy Indicator and Its Application to Post-Consumer Plastic Packaging Waste
Rafay Tashkeel1, Gobinath P Rajarathnam1,2, Wallis Wan1
1School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
A new circo-economic indicator (MCIE) enhances the material circularity indicator (MCI) by including costs. Separately collected plastic waste shows higher circularity than municipal solid waste, suggesting improved sorting and policy incentives are key for better plastic recycling.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Materials Science
- Circular Economy
Background:
- The Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) assesses product circularity using life cycle assessment data.
- Existing indicators often lack economic considerations, limiting a holistic view of sustainability in product lifecycles.
- Plastic waste management faces challenges in achieving true circularity, necessitating refined assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To adapt the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) by integrating economic factors, creating a novel "circo-economic" indicator (MCIE).
- To evaluate the circularity of Dutch post-consumer plastic packaging waste using the new MCIE, comparing separately collected and municipal solid waste streams.
- To identify key factors influencing plastic circularity and propose strategies for improvement.
Main Methods:
- Developed the "circo-economic" indicator (MCIE) by combining product MCI with cost-normalization against estimated plastic recycling costs.
- Applied the MCIE to assess Dutch post-consumer plastic packaging waste, including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), film, and mixed plastics.
- Conducted cost sensitivity analyses to explore the impact of technological and policy changes on MCIE.
Main Results:
- The MCIE for separately collected plastic waste (0.81) was higher than for municipal solid waste (0.73) across most plastic types.
- This indicates that, under cost normalization, separately collected and processed plastics align better with circular economy principles.
- Cost sensitivity analyses revealed that improved sorting technology and policy incentives could significantly enhance the MCIE of municipal solid waste plastics.
Conclusions:
- The developed MCIE provides a more comprehensive assessment of plastic circularity by incorporating economic viability.
- Separate collection of plastic waste demonstrates superior circularity performance compared to mixed municipal solid waste when economic factors are considered.
- Policy changes, industry collaboration, and greater data transparency are crucial for advancing plastic circularity, particularly addressing data restrictions and market integration challenges.
Related Concept Videos
Plasticizers
Plasticizers function by using surface-active agents to create repulsive electrostatic forces between cement particles. This dispersion enhances the concrete's...
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Plastic Deformation in Circular Shafts
Plastic Behavior
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

