Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ACOX1 Gain-of-Function and De Novo ROBO1 Variant in ACOX1-sEDD.

Pediatric dermatology·2026
Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Real-World Evidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tildrakizumab in a Large Spanish Multicenter Cohort from Spanish Psoriasis Group (GPS).

Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

sQuiz your knowledge! A gradually progressive pigmented dermatosis.

European journal of dermatology : EJD·2026
Same author

Mogamulizumab-Induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis in a Patient With Sézary Syndrome.

The Australasian journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Effectiveness and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years With Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Substantial Cardiovascular Comorbidity: A Multicenter Real-World Study.

International journal of dermatology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Postproduction Processing of Electrospun Fibres for Tissue Engineering
15:52

Postproduction Processing of Electrospun Fibres for Tissue Engineering

Published on: August 9, 2012

18.3K

Basic Quality Controls Used in Skin Tissue Engineering.

Laura Linares-Gonzalez1,2,3, Teresa Rodenas-Herranz1,2,3, Fernando Campos2,3

  • 1Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Tissue engineering offers promising skin substitutes (TESSs) for repairing skin defects. This review highlights evaluation methods and proposes guidelines to bridge the gap between preclinical success and clinical application of TESSs.

Keywords:
biochemical methodsbiomechanical evaluationhistological techniquesquality controlskin tissue engineering

More Related Videos

Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents
09:04

Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents

Published on: February 12, 2021

6.7K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Skin Model Diversity with Cost-Effective 3D Cellular Models
08:32

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Skin Model Diversity with Cost-Effective 3D Cellular Models

Published on: October 20, 2023

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Postproduction Processing of Electrospun Fibres for Tissue Engineering
15:52

Postproduction Processing of Electrospun Fibres for Tissue Engineering

Published on: August 9, 2012

18.3K
Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents
09:04

Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents

Published on: February 12, 2021

6.7K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Skin Model Diversity with Cost-Effective 3D Cellular Models
08:32

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Skin Model Diversity with Cost-Effective 3D Cellular Models

Published on: October 20, 2023

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Skin defect reconstruction faces limitations with current methods.
  • Tissue engineering presents a viable alternative using patient-derived cells for tissue repair.
  • Numerous tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) show preclinical promise but few reach clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current evaluation methods for tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs).
  • To propose guidelines for optimizing and evaluating TESSs.
  • To address the discrepancy between preclinical TESS results and clinical translation.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of TESS evaluation techniques.
  • Analysis of in vitro and in vivo assessment strategies.
  • Synthesis of findings to propose standardized evaluation guidelines.

Main Results:

  • A wide array of TESS evaluation methods exist, varying in standardization.
  • Preclinical data for TESSs is often promising, yet clinical translation remains limited.
  • Lack of standardized evaluation protocols is a key barrier to TESS clinical adoption.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization of evaluation methods is crucial for advancing TESS development.
  • Proposed guidelines aim to facilitate consistent and reliable assessment of TESSs.
  • Improved evaluation strategies will accelerate the clinical application of tissue-engineered skin.