Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

3.4K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
3.4K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.0K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.0K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.8K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

373
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
373
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

4.9K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
4.9K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

255
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
255

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Practical considerations when using the covariate-adjusted log-rank test for the analysis of time-to-event endpoints in oncology trials.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Robust Modestly Weighted Log-Rank Tests.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

Bayesian Solutions for Assessing Differential Effects in Biomarker Positive and Negative Subgroups.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Digital twins and Bayesian dynamic borrowing: Two recent approaches for incorporating historical control data.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

The MaxCombo Test Severely Violates the Type I Error Rate.

JAMA oncology·2023
Same author

Who wants to go first? A simulation study of accrual in a stand-alone trial versus starting a platform trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2022
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K

Improved group sequential Holm procedures for testing multiple correlated hypotheses over time.

Fredrik Öhrn1, Julia Niewczas1, Carl-Fredrik Burman1

  • 1Early Biometrics and Statistical Innovation, Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|October 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Clinical trials can improve statistical power by incorporating correlations between different analyses and endpoints. This approach helps avoid overly conservative family-wise error rate (FWER) control, leading to more efficient study designs.

Keywords:
Group sequential testscardiovascularcorrelated test statisticsgroup sequential Holmmultiple primary hypothesesoncologyoverrunningprecision medicine

More Related Videos

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
11:22

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions

Published on: January 30, 2018

10.3K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K
Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
11:22

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions

Published on: January 30, 2018

10.3K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Clinical trials often involve multiple statistical tests, leading to increased risk of false positives (family-wise error rate, FWER).
  • Regulatory agencies mandate strong FWER control, necessitating careful statistical planning.
  • Current practices often conservatively control FWER when accounting for correlations between different comparisons or endpoints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the underutilization of correlations between different comparisons, endpoints, or sub-populations in clinical trial statistical analysis.
  • To address the statistical and philosophical challenges of interpreting time-varying conclusions in repeated hypothesis testing.
  • To demonstrate methods for increasing statistical power in clinical trials while maintaining robust statistical principles.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical principles governing multiple inference in clinical trials.
  • Analysis of correlations between test statistics in group sequential designs and other multiplicity scenarios.
  • Discussion of inference-theoretic approaches to interpreting time-dependent results.
  • Presentation of case studies illustrating power enhancements.

Main Results:

  • Family-wise error rate (FWER) is often controlled more conservatively than necessary due to unutilized correlations between different comparisons or endpoints.
  • Time-changing conclusions (e.g., rejecting a hypothesis at interim but accepting it finally) present inferential challenges.
  • Incorporating relevant correlations can lead to less conservative critical values and increased statistical power.

Conclusions:

  • There is potential to increase statistical power in clinical trials by more effectively utilizing correlations between various statistical tests.
  • Sound statistical principles can guide the interpretation of complex results, including time-varying conclusions.
  • Optimizing multiplicity adjustments through correlation utilization enhances clinical trial efficiency and scientific rigor.