Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Psychophysical Tracking Method to Measure Taste Preferences in Children and Adults
Published on: July 16, 2016
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in Children: The Interplay of Household SNAP and WIC Participation
Francesco Acciai1, Mithuna Srinivasan2, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati1
1College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Introduction:
Although sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is associated with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participation, no national studies have examined the interplay between these programs. This study compares children's sugar-sweetened beverage consumption across households enrolled in one, both, or neither program.
Methods:
A total of 4 waves (2009-2010 to 2015-2016) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were combined to obtain a sample of 4,772 children aged 0-19 years living in households eligible for both SNAP and WIC (households with income ≤130% of the Federal Poverty Level). Children were grouped as living in 4 household types: SNAP only; WIC only; SNAP + WIC; and neither program. Beverages with any added sugars were classified as SSBs. Two-part regression models examined the adjusted association between SSB consumption and program participation. Analyses were conducted in 2020.
Results:
Compared with the SNAP‒only group, children in all other household types had lower odds of SSB consumption (AOR=0.44, p=0.002 for WIC only; AOR=0.69, p=0.020 for SNAP + WIC; AOR=0.61, p=0.025 for neither program). The lower probability of SSB consumption for children from WIC‒participating households was mostly driven by children aged 0-5 years, with the differences weakening for children aged 6-12 years and completely disappearing for those aged 12-19 years. No significant differences were observed for the amount of added sugar consumed by SSB consumers.
Conclusions:
Household WIC participation-whether jointly with SNAP or alone-may confer protection against SSB consumption. Unlike SNAP, WIC, by design, provides participating households with more information and opportunities to access and consume healthier diets. Understanding how SNAP and WIC interact can help policymakers improve the design and nutritional benefit of the U.S. food safety net.
More Related Videos
08:01A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
07:33Sucrose Preference and Novelty-Induced Hypophagia Tests in Rats using an Automated Food Intake Monitoring System
Published on: May 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Convenience Sampling Method
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Sugars as Energy Storage Molecules
Glucose Absorption Into the Small Intestine
Dietary Connections
Regulation of Food Intake
Regulation of Water Intake