Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025
Surgical Training for the Implantation of Neocortical Microelectrode Arrays Using a Formaldehyde-fixed Human Cadaver Model
Published on: November 19, 2017
Adoption of Advanced Microneurosurgical Technologies: An International Survey
Visish M Srinivasan1, Nathan A Shlobin2, Katherine Karahalios1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Background:
Operating microscopes and adjunctive technologies are continually refined to advance microneurosurgical care. How frequently these advances are used is unknown. In the present study, we assessed the international adoption of microneurosurgical technologies and discussed their value.
Methods:
A 27-question electronic survey was distributed to cerebrovascular neurosurgeon members of U.S., European, and North American neurosurgical societies and social media networks of cerebrovascular and skull base neurosurgeons. The survey encompassed the surgeons' training background, surgical preferences, and standard microneurosurgical practices.
Results:
Of the respondents, 56% (53 of 95) were attendings, 74% (70 of 95) were in their first 10 years of practice, and 67% (63 of 94) practiced at an academic teaching hospital. Vascular, endovascular, and skull base fellowships had been completed by 38% (36 of 95), 27% (26 of 95), and 32% (30 of 95) of the respondents, respectively. Most respondents did not use an exoscope (78%; 73 of 94), a mouthpiece (61%; 58 of 95), or foot pedals (56%; 55 of 94). All 95 respondents used a microscope, and 71 (75%) used Zeiss microscopes. Overall, 57 neurosurgeons (60%) used indocyanine green for aneurysms (n = 54), arteriovenous malformations (n = 43), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (n = 42). Most (80%; 75 of 94) did not use fluorescence. The respondents with a vascular-focused practice more commonly used indocyanine green, Yellow 560 fluorescence, and intraoperative 2-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. The respondents with a skull base-focused practice more commonly used foot pedals and an endoscope-assist device.
Conclusions:
The results from the present survey have characterized the current adoption of operative microscopes and adjunctive technologies in microneurosurgery. Despite numerous innovations to improve the symbiosis between neurosurgeon and microscope, their adoption has been underwhelming. Future advances are essential to improve surgical outcomes.
