Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
Published on: August 14, 2018
Using BayesModelS to provide Bayesian- and phylogenetically-informed primate body mass predictions.
James D Pampush1, Edward J Fuselier2, Gabriel S Yapuncich3
1Department of Exercise Science, High Point University, High Point, NC 27260, USA; Department of Physician Assistant Studies, High Point University, High Point, NC 27260, USA.
Paleontologists can better predict extinct animal body mass using phylogenetically informed Bayesian methods like BayesModelS. These advanced techniques, incorporating evolutionary relationships, offer superior accuracy compared to traditional statistical approaches for fossil body mass estimation.
Area of Science:
- Paleontology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate body mass prediction is crucial for reconstructing extinct species' ecology.
- Paleontologists often estimate body mass from fossilized dental dimensions.
- Traditional methods used frequentist statistics, with phylogenetic considerations being a recent addition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply and evaluate BayesModelS, a phylogenetically informed Bayesian method, for predicting body mass in euarchontan species.
- To compare the predictive accuracy of BayesModelS against ordinary least squares, phylogenetic generalized least squares, and phylogenetic independent contrasts (PICs).
Main Methods:
- Applied BayesModelS to a dataset of 49 euarchontan species.
- Utilized dental and postcranial variables for body mass prediction.
- Compared prediction accuracy with ordinary least squares, phylogenetic generalized least squares, and PICs.
Main Results:
- BayesModelS and PICs demonstrated substantially higher predictive accuracy than ordinary least squares and phylogenetic generalized least squares.
- Improved performance was most notable when using dental proxies or when proxies exhibited high phylogenetic covariance.
- BayesModelS and PIC methods produced less variance in predicted values across different body mass proxies for Notharctus tenebrosus.
Conclusions:
- Phylogenetically informed methods, particularly BayesModelS and PICs, are more effective for predicting body mass in paleontological contexts.
- These methods offer improved accuracy and reduced variance, especially with dental data.
- The study provides scripts to facilitate the application of BayesModelS and PICs for paleontological research.
Related Concept Videos
Clearance Models: Physiological Models
The organ's clearance rate depends on the blood flow to the organ and the extraction ratio (E). The extraction ratio describes the organ's...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models
Phylogeny
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

