Efficacy of sonic hedgehog inhibitors rechallenge, after initial complete response in recurrent advanced basal cell

A Bassompierre1, S Dalac2, B Dreno3

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Lille University, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

ESMO Open
|October 24, 2021
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors effectively treat advanced basal cell carcinoma but are often discontinued due to side effects. Rechallenge with SMO inhibitors after initial response shows reduced efficacy, suggesting resistance may develop.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors are approved for advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC).
  • High adverse event rates frequently lead to treatment discontinuation, even after achieving a complete response (CR).
  • Long-term outcomes after discontinuing SMO inhibitors for aBCC are not well-documented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMO inhibitors (vismodegib and sonidegib) in patients rechallenged after initial complete response to vismodegib.
  • To analyze the long-term evolution of advanced basal cell carcinoma following SMO inhibitor treatment discontinuation.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, multicenter, descriptive study using the CARADERM database from 40 French hospitals.
  • Inclusion of patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma requiring systemic treatment.
  • Analysis of data from patients treated with vismodegib, focusing on those achieving CR and subsequent outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Of 303 patients treated with vismodegib, 110 achieved CR and discontinued treatment, primarily due to adverse events.
  • 48.1% of these patients relapsed after a median of 24 months.
  • Among relapsed patients, 35 were retreated with an SMO inhibitor, achieving an overall response rate of 65.7% (34.3% CR, 31.4% partial response).

Conclusions:

  • Relapse after discontinuing SMO inhibitors for advanced basal cell carcinoma occurs in nearly half of patients within approximately 24 months.
  • Rechallenge with SMO inhibitors is a viable therapeutic option, but efficacy may be reduced, potentially due to resistance mechanisms.
  • Further research is needed to understand and overcome resistance to SMO inhibitors in advanced basal cell carcinoma.