Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

2.8K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
2.8K
Barriers to Effective Communication II01:21

Barriers to Effective Communication II

4.0K
The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
4.0K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

252.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
252.0K
What is Conservation Biology?01:57

What is Conservation Biology?

19.4K
Conservation biology is a scientific field that focuses on the preservation of biodiversity in order to protect ecosystems while meeting the needs of the human population. Humans require properly functioning ecosystems to maintain our supply of natural resources, including food, medicines, and building materials.
19.4K
Barriers to Effective Communication I01:30

Barriers to Effective Communication I

10.1K
A communication barrier is any distortion or interruption during a conversation, resulting in miscommunication of the message. A good communicator should know these barriers and continuously check for the listener's understanding by obtaining feedback.
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
10.1K
Contact-dependent Signaling01:19

Contact-dependent Signaling

45.3K
Contact-dependent signaling, as the name suggests, requires that communicating cells be in direct contact with each other. This is achieved either through receptor-ligand interactions or by specialized cytoplasmic channels that allow the flow of small molecules between cells. In animal cells, channels called gap junctions facilitate contact-dependent signaling in certain tissues, whereas, plasmodesmata perform a similar function in plants.
Gap Junctions
In animal cells, gap junctions are formed...
45.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Where Do, and Should, Science and Science Education Happen?

Science & education·2026
Same journal

'We Often Forget It Was a Disaster': Cross-Curricular Teacher Collaboration to Develop a Curriculum Unit on the Titanic Disaster.

Science & education·2025
Same journal

Indonesian Prospective Teachers' Scientific Habits of Mind:A Cross‑Grade Study in the Context of Local and Global Socio‑scientific Issues.

Science & education·2023
Same journal

Exploring the Role of Multiplist Epistemic Beliefs on COVID-19 Conspiracies and Prevention Among Undergraduates.

Science & education·2023
Same journal

A Framework for Evidentiary Reasoning in Biology: Insights from Laboratory Courses Focused on Evolutionary Tree-thinking.

Science & education·2023
Same journal

To FRA or not to FRA: What is the question for science education?

Science & education·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.3K

Who Speaks for Science?

Douglas Allchin1

  • 1Minnesota Center for the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.

Science & Education
|October 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Scientific literacy is crucial for navigating misinformation. Understanding who speaks for science and media literacy helps citizens discern credible information from deceptive imitation.

Area of Science:

  • Science communication
  • Media literacy
  • Scientific literacy

Background:

  • Many individuals, including flat-Earthers and anti-vaxxers, express trust in science but rely on flawed information.
  • This phenomenon highlights a critical challenge in scientific literacy amidst abundant digital information and competing interests.
  • The central issue is not the philosophical basis of trusting science, but identifying legitimate scientific authorities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the sociological question of 'who speaks for science' in an era of misinformation.
  • To equip educators with strategies to teach students about navigating mediated scientific communication.
  • To foster critical evaluation of scientific information and identify deceptive practices.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
CredibilityDeceptive practicesExpertiseScience con artistScience media literacy

More Related Videos

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
07:47

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

889

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.3K
Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
07:47

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

889
  • Analysis of scientific communication practices and their role in public understanding.
  • Examination of credibility, expertise, and honesty in science discourse.
  • Identification of deceptive strategies employed by those imitating scientific authority.

    • Main Results:

    • Students are vulnerable to misinformation due to epistemic dependence.
    • Media literacy is essential for discerning credible scientific sources.
    • Imitators of science often use deceptive tactics to appear authoritative.

    Conclusions:

    • Teachers play a vital role in developing students' scientific literacy and critical thinking skills.
    • Understanding science communication is key to navigating the complex information landscape.
    • Promoting critical evaluation of scientific claims is essential for informed citizenship.