Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Genotypic Characterization of Clinical Ureaplasma Isolates Circulating in

Hongxia Ma1, Xuemei Zhang2, Xiaoxing Shi3

  • 1Department of Health Management Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Frontiers in Microbiology
|October 25, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Antimicrobial resistance in Ureaplasma species is a growing concern, particularly in Ureaplasma parvum (UPA) which shows higher resistance rates to certain antibiotics like ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin. Identifying Ureaplasma parvum or Ureaplasma urealyticum is crucial for effective treatment selection.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Molecular Epidemiology

Background:

  • Rising global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Ureaplasma spp. necessitates further investigation.
  • Limited data exists on AMR profiles, resistance mechanisms, and clonality of Ureaplasma clinical isolates across different regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility, resistance mechanisms, and molecular epidemiology of Ureaplasma spp. clinical isolates from Shanghai, China.
  • To compare resistance patterns between Ureaplasma parvum (UPA) and Ureaplasma urealyticum (UUR).

Main Methods:

  • Isolation and identification of Ureaplasma species using culture media and PCR.
  • Antimicrobial susceptibility testing via broth microdilution.
  • Investigation of genetic determinants for resistance to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines using PCR/DNA sequencing.
  • Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for molecular epidemiology.

Main Results:

  • Ureaplasma parvum (UPA) was identified in 87.60% and Ureaplasma urealyticum (UUR) in 12.40% of 258 isolates.
  • Azithromycin (AZI), josamycin (JOS), and clarithromycin (CLA) showed the highest sensitivity.
  • Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains accounted for 15.12%, predominantly UPA.
  • UPA exhibited significantly higher resistance rates to ciprofloxacin (CIP) and roxithromycin (ROX) compared to UUR.
  • Specific mutations in gyrA, parC, ribosomal proteins L4 and L22, and the tet(M) gene were identified as resistance mechanisms, mainly in UPA.
  • Sequence type 1 (ST1) was the predominant clone among MDR isolates.

Conclusions:

  • Ureaplasma parvum strains demonstrate higher resistance rates, substitution rates, and MDR rates, particularly to ROX and CIP.
  • Azithromycin, josamycin, and clarithromycin are the most effective antimicrobial agents against these isolates.
  • Identifying UPA or UUR is critical for guiding appropriate clinical treatment decisions.
  • Key resistance mechanisms involve specific gene substitutions in parC and ribosomal protein L22.
  • ST1 represents the dominant Ureaplasma clone associated with MDR to fluoroquinolones and macrolides in Shanghai.