Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

15:30
A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
Published on: August 5, 2020
11.9K
Improving Selection Efficiency of Crop Breeding With Genomic Prediction Aided Sparse Phenotyping
Sang He1,2, Yong Jiang3, Rebecca Thistlethwaite4
1Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Frontiers in Plant Science
|October 25, 2021
Summary
Sparse phenotyping, using genomic prediction, can enhance crop breeding selection response without increasing costs. This method proves effective when environmental correlations align favorably, optimizing breeding program efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Genetics
- Plant Breeding
Background:
- Expanding phenotyping environments improves crop line selection accuracy in early breeding stages.
- High costs often limit the feasibility of extensive phenotyping.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a sparse phenotyping method utilizing genomic prediction for predicting missing phenotypes.
- To assess the impact of sparse phenotyping on selection response in wheat and rice.
Main Methods:
- Simulated selection response under a sparse phenotyping strategy.
- Compared sparse phenotyping against complete phenotyping across diverse environmental correlations.
- Utilized genomic prediction to infer phenotypes in un-phenotyped environments.
Main Results:
- Sparse phenotyping significantly increased selection response when environments showed specific correlation patterns (negative or low positive among tested, high positive for extension).
- No improvement in selection response was observed when all environments were positively correlated or highly positively correlated.
- Effectiveness is contingent on the correlation structure between phenotyped and un-phenotyped environments.
Conclusions:
- Genomics-based sparse phenotyping offers a cost-effective strategy to potentially improve selection response in mid-stage crop breeding.
- The success of sparse phenotyping depends critically on the environmental correlation landscape.
- This approach can optimize resource allocation in breeding programs.
Related Concept Videos
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
20.1K
Crop cultivation has a long history in human civilization, with records showing the cultivation of cereal plants beginning at around 8000 BC. This early plant breeding was developed primarily to provide a steady supply of food.
20.1K
Light Acquisition
8.7K
In order to produce glucose, plants need to capture sufficient light energy. Many modern plants have evolved leaves specialized for light acquisition. Leaves can be only millimeters in width or tens of meters wide, depending on the environment. Due to competition for sunlight, evolution has driven the evolution of increasingly larger leaves and taller plants, to avoid shading by their neighbors with contaminant elaboration of root architecture and mechanisms to transport water and nutrients.
8.7K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.4K
Monohybrid Crosses
233.0K
Overview
233.0K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
6.8K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
6.8K

