Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
Published on: July 1, 2014
A mutual information criterion with applications to canonical correlation analysis and graphical models
Timothy DelSole1,2,3, Michael K Tippett4
1Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences George Mason University Fairfax Virginia 22030 USA.
This study introduces the Mutual Information Criterion (MIC), a new tool for determining conditional independence. MIC offers a simpler and more direct approach compared to existing methods for model selection in statistical analysis.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Machine Learning
- Information Theory
Background:
- Model selection in statistical analysis often relies on criteria like Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC).
- Existing small-sample corrections for information criteria can be complex to apply.
- There is a need for more direct and accessible methods for variable and model selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive a new criterion for deciding conditional independence.
- To develop a method that is easier to apply than existing small-sample corrections of AIC.
- To provide a criterion applicable to variable selection in canonical correlation analysis and graphical model selection.
Main Methods:
- Derivation of a novel criterion based on information theory principles.
- Demonstration of consistency with small-sample corrections of AIC.
- Establishing the criterion's reduction to mutual information under ideal distribution assumptions.
Main Results:
- Introduction of the Mutual Information Criterion (MIC).
- MIC is shown to be consistent with small-sample AIC corrections.
- MIC simplifies the process of variable selection in canonical correlation analysis and graphical model selection.
Conclusions:
- The Mutual Information Criterion (MIC) provides a more direct and applicable method for conditional independence decisions.
- MIC offers a valuable alternative to existing, less accessible, small-sample criteria.
- This criterion enhances statistical model selection, particularly in complex analyses like canonical correlation and graphical models.
More Related Videos
09:23Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
Published on: August 16, 2017
07:11Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
Published on: November 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
Correlations
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...