Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanning.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

The risk of believing that emotions are bad and uncontrollable: association with orthorexia nervosa.

Eating and weight disorders : EWD·2025
Same author

Unexpected sounds induce a rapid inhibition of eye-movement responses.

Psychophysiology·2024
Same author

Parafoveal Processing and Transposed-Letter Effects in Developmental Dyslexic Reading.

Dyslexia (Chichester, England)·2024
Same author

Breathing Life Into Meta-Analytic Methods.

Journal of cognition·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.4K

Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.

Victoria I Adedeji1, Martin R Vasilev2, Julie A Kirkby2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole House, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK. vadedeji@bournemouth.ac.uk.

Psychological Research
|October 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Oral reading alters eye movements during paragraph reading. Return-sweep saccades are shorter, and corrective saccades increase, suggesting more foveal focus. Fixations near line breaks may aid eye-voice span modulation.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.4K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Reading Science

Background:

  • Return-sweep saccades are crucial for reading, moving the eyes between lines.
  • Previous studies focused solely on silent reading, overlooking oral reading differences.
  • Oral reading involves articulatory demands and eye-voice span (EVS) coordination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how oral reading affects return-sweep saccades compared to silent reading.
  • To analyze differences in saccade launch/landing positions and corrective saccade probability.
  • To examine fixation durations adjacent to return-sweeps in both reading modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Skilled adult readers performed paragraph reading tasks aloud and silently.
  • Measured return-sweep saccade launch and landing positions.
  • Recorded corrective saccade probability and fixation durations near line boundaries.

Main Results:

  • Return-sweeps were shorter in oral reading (launched closer to line end, landed closer to next line start).
  • Corrective saccade probability was higher during oral reading.
  • Fixation durations near line breaks were longer in oral reading, especially for accurate line-initial fixations.

Conclusions:

  • Oral reading shifts eye movements, emphasizing foveal processing over parafoveal.
  • Readers may use fixations near line breaks as pauses to manage the eye-voice span.
  • Findings highlight modality-specific adaptations in reading eye movements.