Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

265
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
265
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

454
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
454
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

383
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
383
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

901
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
901

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data-Driven Distributed Kalman Filter-Based Sensor Fault Isolation and Estimation for Large-Scale Interconnected Systems.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2025
Same author

Observer-Based Fault-Tolerant and Resilient Control Under Physical Faults and Integrity Cyberattacks.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2025
Same author

Integrating Deep Model-Based Learning With Modular State-Based Stackelberg Games for Self-Optimizing Distributed Production Systems.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2025
Same author

Resampling Multi-Resolution Signals Using the Bag of Functions Framework: Addressing Variable Sampling Rates in Time Series Data.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Time series compression using quaternion valued neural networks and quaternion backpropagation.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2025
Same author

MSCSCC-Net: multi-scale contextual spatial-channel correlation network for forgery detection and localization of JPEG-compressed image.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Intervention Feasible Region and Driver Risk Capacity Aware Human-Machine Collaborative Safe Trajectory Planning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Unified Differential Denoising Learning Framework With a Pre-Trained Model and Fuzzy Graph Networks for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Self-Supervised Continuous Dynamic Graph Representation Learning via Hawkes Processes.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

cPU: Consistent Risk Estimator for Positive-Unlabeled Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Tuning-Free Latent Diffusion Models for Ultrahigh-Resolution Image Editing.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Hidden Data Recovery and Forecasting via Next-Generation Reservoir Computing With Multiscale Delay Selection.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice
08:59

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.3K

Gradient Monitored Reinforcement Learning.

Mohammed Sharafath Abdul Hameed, Gavneet Singh Chadha, Andreas Schwung

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |October 25, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces gradient monitoring (GM) to improve deep reinforcement learning (RL) by reducing gradient variance for faster training and better generalization. Variants like adaptive M-WGM automatically optimize network learning and size.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
    08:51

    Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    1.6K
    The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
    09:01

    The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

    Published on: July 8, 2015

    12.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

    An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice
    08:59

    An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice

    Published on: March 3, 2023

    2.3K
    Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
    08:51

    Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    1.6K
    The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
    09:01

    The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

    Published on: July 8, 2015

    12.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Machine Learning
    • Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Background:

    • Deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms often face challenges with slow convergence and limited generalization.
    • High variance in gradients during training can hinder efficient learning and lead to suboptimal policy.
    • Existing methods may not dynamically adapt to the learning process for optimal performance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a novel neural network training approach, gradient monitoring (GM), for enhancing deep reinforcement learning performance.
    • To reduce gradient variance for a more targeted and efficient learning process.
    • To introduce adaptive variants of GM that automatically adjust learning strategies and network architecture.

    Main Methods:

    • Gradient Monitoring (GM): A method to steer neural network weight updates based on dynamic training feedback.
    • Momentum with GM (M-WGM): Adjusts backpropagated gradients based on learning parameters.
    • Adaptive M-WGM (AM-WGM): Dynamically adjusts learning focus and automatically determines network size by freezing weights.

    Main Results:

    • Proposed GM variants demonstrably improve model performance and generalization capabilities.
    • AM-WGM facilitates automatic adjustment between focused and dispersed learning based on reward feedback.
    • The method successfully applied to discrete (multi-robot coordination, Atari games) and continuous (MuJoCo) control tasks using A2C and PPO.

    Conclusions:

    • Gradient monitoring offers a significant advancement in training deep reinforcement learning models.
    • The adaptive nature of AM-WGM enhances learning efficiency and automates network architecture selection.
    • The presented methods show strong applicability and performance improvements, particularly in generalization for RL agents.