Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

11:19
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
11.7K
Streptococcus oralis Biofilm Formation on Titanium Surfaces
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|October 26, 2021
Summary
Titanium surface topography, specifically sandblasted versus machined, did not significantly impact Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation. However, sandblasted surfaces showed more dead bacterial cells within the biofilm.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Microbiology
- Surface Science
Background:
- Titanium's surface properties influence bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, critical factors in implant success.
- Understanding how different titanium surface topographies affect oral bacteria is essential for developing improved dental materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation on machined versus sandblasted titanium surfaces.
- To characterize the nanoroughness, wettability, and chemical composition of the titanium surfaces.
Main Methods:
- Machined and sandblasted titanium disks were analyzed for surface topography and chemistry.
- Water contact angle measurements assessed surface wettability.
- Titanium disks were incubated with saliva to form an acquired pellicle, followed by Streptococcus oralis exposure.
- Biofilm formation, cell viability, and colony-forming units (CFUs) were evaluated at 24 and 48 hours.
Main Results:
- Sandblasted titanium exhibited higher superficial oxides, roughness, and hydrophilicity compared to machined surfaces.
- Despite topographic differences, Streptococcus oralis biofilm biomass and CFUs were similar on both surfaces.
- Sandblasted surfaces showed a higher percentage of dead Streptococcus oralis cells in the biofilm.
Conclusions:
- Surface topography differences between machined and sandblasted titanium do not significantly alter Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation.
- While biofilm quantity is unaffected, surface characteristics may influence bacterial viability within the biofilm.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
453
09:44Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
Published on: October 20, 2011
16.3K