Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

699
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
699
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

32
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
32
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.6K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.1K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children across diverse societies exchange reasons to resolve disagreements.

Child development·2026
Same author

Striking global similarities in dog-human interactions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

(When) is it okay to be angry? Children and adults' judgments in China and the United States.

Child development·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Cognitive change without linguistic change: The rise of egocentric frames of reference in the Hai||om" [Cognition 273 (2026) 106522].

Cognition·2026
Same author

Children in Kenya and the US are averse to epistemic injustice.

Child development·2026
Same author

Pupil size changes reveal that dogs are sensitive to the social conventions behind human gestures.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Hunting ecology predicts eye arrangements in the modular visual system of spiders.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Sub-second fluctuations between top-down and bottom-up modes distinguish diverse human brain states.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Queen bees offload pesticide burden to eggs when social buffering is overwhelmed.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Pitch selectivity in ferret auditory cortex.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

A cell size-dependent competition between geometry and polarity governs nuclear and spindle positioning in early embryos.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Trophic cascades drive sustainability in the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system.

Current biology : CB·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.3K

Chimpanzees consider alternative possibilities.

Jan M Engelmann1, Christoph J Völter2, Cathal O'Madagain3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650, USA.

Current Biology : CB
|October 26, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chimpanzees can reason about alternative possibilities, challenging previous research. This suggests that the capacity for considering

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

  • Human cognition involves reasoning about actual and possible events, crucial for moral judgment, planning, and causal understanding.
  • Chimpanzees exhibit related cognitive skills like future planning, action evaluation, and causal reasoning.
  • Previous research suggested chimpanzees cannot represent alternative possibilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the evolutionary origins of reasoning about alternative possibilities.
  • To directly test whether chimpanzees can represent alternative possibilities.
  • To challenge previous findings on chimpanzee's ability to consider alternatives.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of a novel experimental method to assess reasoning about alternatives in chimpanzees.
  • Direct testing of chimpanzee's cognitive abilities in representing possibilities beyond the actual state of events.

Main Results:

  • Results challenge the conclusion that chimpanzees cannot represent alternative possibilities.
  • Evidence suggests chimpanzee thought extends beyond actual events to consider what could be.
  • Findings indicate a shared capacity for reasoning about alternatives between humans and chimpanzees.

Conclusions:

  • Chimpanzee cognition is not limited to present realities but includes reasoning about alternative possibilities.
  • This capacity for considering alternatives may be an evolutionary precursor to complex human thought.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the scope and evolutionary trajectory of this cognitive ability.