Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Virtual screening using docking and molecular dynamics of cannabinoid analogs against CB1 and CB2 receptors
Antistio Aviz-Amador1, Neyder Contreras-Puentes2, Jairo Mercado-Camargo3
1Pharmacology and Therapeutic Group, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
Background:
Cannabis sativa has been attributed to different pharmacological properties. A number of secondary metabolites such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBD), and different analogs, with highly promising biological activity on CB1 and CB2 receptors, have been identified.
Methods:
Thus, this study aimed was to evaluate the activity of THC, CBD, and their analogs using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations (MD) methods. Initially, the molecules (ligands) were selected by bioinformatics searches in databases. Subsequently, CB1 and CB2 receptors were retrieved from the protein data bank database. Afterward, each receptor and its ligands were optimized to perform molecular docking. Then, MD Simulation was performed with the most stable ligand-receptor complexes. Finally, the Molecular Mechanics-Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-PBSA) method was applied to analyze the binding free energy between ligands and cannabinoid receptors.
Results:
The results obtained showed that ligand LS-61176 presented the best affinity in the molecular docking analysis. Also, this analog could be a CB1 negative allosteric modulator like CBD and probably an agonist in CB2 like THC and CBD according to their dynamic behavior in silico. The possibility of having a THC and a CBD analog (LS-61176) as a promising molecule for experimental evaluation since it could have no central side-effects on CB1 and have effects of CB2 useful in pain, inflammation, and some immunological disorders. Docking results were validate using ROC curve for both cannabinoids receptor where AUC for CB1 receptor was 0.894±0.024, and for CB2 receptor AUC was 0.832±0032, indicating good affinity prediction.
More Related Videos
06:03Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16
Published on: July 15, 2019
10:21Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drug Discovery: Overview