Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

08:36
Implantation of a New Micro Acoustic Tag in Juvenile Pacific Lamprey and American Eel
Published on: March 16, 2019
10.8K
Animal lifestyle affects acceptable mass limits for attached tags
Rory P Wilson1, Kayleigh A Rose1, Richard Gunner1
1Swansea Laboratory for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|October 27, 2021
Summary
New research reveals that current animal tag mass limits may harm wildlife. A revised method considering animal movement forces suggests safer tag masses, crucial for ethical wildlife research.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Animal Biologging
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Animal-attached devices are vital for ecological research.
- Current guidelines recommend tag mass not exceed 3% of an animal's body mass to minimize harm.
- These guidelines overlook forces generated by animal movement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a new method for determining acceptable animal tag mass limits.
- To account for forces exerted by animal movement, not just static tag mass.
- To revise ethical guidelines for attaching devices to wildlife.
Main Methods:
- Utilized collar-attached accelerometer data from 10 diverse terrestrial species.
- Quantified animal "athleticism" based on time spent accelerating.
- Calculated forces exerted by tags (acceleration × tag mass) to derive new limits.
Main Results:
- A revised method suggests optimal tag masses should be 1.6%–2.98% of body mass, varying with athleticism.
- Existing "3%" tags can exert forces equivalent to 4%–19% of body mass in carnivores during movement.
- A cheetah experienced tag forces up to 54% of its body mass while hunting.
Conclusions:
- The 3% rule is insufficient as it ignores dynamic forces from animal movement.
- New methods are needed to accurately assess the impact of attached devices on animal welfare.
- Ethical guidelines for animal tagging must be updated to incorporate movement-induced forces.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
14.3K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
14.3K
What are Populations and Communities?
35.3K
Overview
35.3K

