Interfraction dose deviation and catheter position in cervical interstitial and intracavitary image guided HDR...

Interstitial and intracavitary gynecological HDR brachytherapy involve precise, localized delivery to targets with high dose gradients, sparing adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Due to the proximity of the rectum, bowel and bladder to the target, deviations in the applicator or catheter with respect to patient anatomy can significantly increase dose to OAR. The magnitude and direction of applicator and catheter migration at each fraction was assessed for template interstitial and tandem and ring (T&R) cohorts. The cohort included twelve gynecological patients with intact cervical lesions treated with external beam and brachytherapy. Pre-treatment CT images were registered to the simulation CT with respect to the target. Treatment catheter positions transformed into the planning CT coordinate system to evaluate localized catheter displacement and dose distributions calculated at each fraction. Dose was evaluated on the planning CT with planning contours and dwell locations at treatment position. Absolute deviation, depth and deflection angle for all patients were 4.6 ± 4.2 mm, -1.4 ± 4.0 mm, and 3.1 ± 2.3° respectively (n = 516 catheter positions for all treatment fractions and patients, mean ± SD). Absolute catheter deviation and deflection magnitude for interstitial treatments increased overall with each subsequent fraction with an overall increase of catheter retraction at each fraction (p < 0.005, n = 492 catheters, Kruskal-Wallis). A target EQD2 D90 reduction of 10 ± 10% and 7.7 ± 8.7% of the planned dose for interstitial and T&R cohorts respectively. There was an overall increase in bladder and rectal doses at each fraction. Catheter tracking in interstitial and intracavitary gynecological treatments with CT imaging revealed significant changes in catheter positioning with respect to the target volume. Overall deviations increased in magnitude with each subsequent fraction in the interstitial treatments. This caused patient dosimetry deviations, including target dose reduction and adjacent OAR doses changes.