Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
Cancer diagnosis and suicide outcomes: Umbrella review and methodological considerations
Raffaella Calati1, Chiara Filipponi2, William Mansi2
1Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France.
Background:
Suicide outcomes in cancer patients represent a major public health concern. We performed an umbrella review (UR) including all meta-analyses (MAs) and systematic reviews (SRs) published on the association between cancer and suicide outcomes.
Methods:
Eligible studies were searched in the main scientific databases up to January 23rd, 2021. Eligible MAs/SRs focused on all suicide phenotypes among cancer patients. Evidence of the association was extracted; the credibility and quality of the included studies were evaluated using ad-hoc tools, including "A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2-Revised" (AMSTAR-2-R).
Results:
Six MAs and 6 SRs were included. The standardized mortality ratio of suicide in cancer patients was 1.5 to 1.7-fold higher than in the general population. Risk factors for suicide outcomes among cancer patients were male sex and older age, a cancer diagnosis within the prior year, and some specific cancer sites. Among 107 associations, 90 (84.1%) were supported by high credibility of evidence (class II). However, all studies reported a large heterogeneity (I2> 50%) and the majority of them reported considerable heterogeneity (I2> 75%). All MAs used random-effects measures. All MAs but one assessed publication bias and only one disclosed it. The majority of MAs/SRs showed critically low quality based on AMSTAR-2-R.
Limitations:
We could not perform additional analyses due to the limited number of MAs.
Conclusions:
This UR underlines the inflated risk for suicide among cancer patients. Upcoming, well-designed studies are needed to account for a broader set of variables. Several methodological issues likewise warrant attention.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Longitudinal Research
Assumptions of Survival Analysis