Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025
Short Session High Intensity Interval Training and Treadmill Assessment in Aged Mice
Published on: February 2, 2019
Effects of Heat Acclimatization, Heat Acclimation, and Intermittent Exercise Heat Training on Time-Trial Performance
Background:
The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of heat acclimatization (HAz) followed by heat acclimation (HA), and intermittent heat training (IHT) on time-trial performance.
Hypothesis:
Time-trial performance will improve after HA and will further improve with twice a week of IHT.
Study Design:
Interventional study.
Level Of Evidence:
Level 3.
Methods:
A total of 26 male athletes (mean ± SD; age, 35 ± 12 years; body mass, 72.8 ± 8.9 kg; peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak], 57.3 ± 6.7 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed five 4-km time trials (baseline, post-HAz, post-HA, post-IHT4, post-IHT8) in the heat (ambient temperature, 35.4°C ± 0.3°C; relative humidity, 46.7% ± 1.2%) on a motorized treadmill. After baseline time trial, participants performed HAz (109 ± 10 days) followed by post-HAz time trial. Then, participants completed 5 days of HA, which involved exercising to induce hyperthermia (38.50°C-39.75°C) for 60 minutes. Participants were then divided into 3 groups and completed IHT either twice per week (IHTMAX), once per week (IHTMIN), or not at all (IHTCON) over an 8-week period. The exercise used for the IHT matched the HA. Four-kilometer time trials were performed after 4 weeks (post-IHT4) and 8 weeks of IHT (post-IHT8).
Results:
Time trial was faster in post-HA (17.98 ± 2.51 minutes) compared with baseline (18.61 ± 3.06 minutes; P = 0.037) and post-HAz (18.66 ± 3.12 minutes; P = 0.023). Percentage change in time trial was faster in IHTMAX (-3.9% ± 5.2%) compared with IHTCON (11.5% ± 16.9%) (P = 0.020) and approached statistical significance with large effect (effect size = 0.96) compared with IHTMIN (1.6% ± 6.2%; P = 0.059) at post-IHT8. Additionally, IHTMAX (-2.2% ± 4.2%) was faster than IHTCON (3.6% ± 6.9%) (P = 0.05) at post-IHT4.
Conclusion:
These results indicate that HA after HAz induces additional improvement in time-trial performance. IHT twice per week shows improvement after 8 weeks, while once per week maintains performance for 8 weeks. No IHT results in a loss of adaptations after 4 weeks and even greater losses after 8 weeks.
Clinical Relevance:
HA after HAz improves time-trial performance, twice a week of IHT improves performance further, and once a week of IHT maintains performance for at least 8 weeks.
Related Concept Videos
02:45Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
01:20Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...