Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

8.4K
The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
8.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A preliminary analysis of replicating the biomechanics of helmet therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery·2022
Same author

A Computational Framework to Predict Calvarial Growth: Optimising Management of Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2022
Same author

Intentional craniofacial remodelling in Europe in the XIXth century: Quantitative evidence of soft tissue modifications from Toulouse, France.

Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery·2022
Same author

Management of sagittal craniosynostosis: morphological comparison of eight surgical techniques.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2022
Same author

Using Sensitivity Analysis to Develop a Validated Computational Model of Post-operative Calvarial Growth in Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology·2021
Same author

Craniofacial Surgery-Related Hashtag Utilisation on Instagram.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2021
Same journal

Peripheral B-cell receptor repertoire predicts immune-related adverse events following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Effects of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae zoocompost on the mineral element content of blue honeysuckle berries.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Investigation on absorption refrigeration performance of R1243zf with imidazolium ionic liquid as the working pairs.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

DeepTriage-CN: integrating clinical text with vital signs for emergency department admission prediction in an aging population.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Gold nanoparticles as dual-action antiviral agents: disruption of SARS-CoV-2 viral envelopes and RNA integrity.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Comparison of capillary microsampling and venous blood for multi-pathogen serosurveillance.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

650

Predicting and comparing three corrective techniques for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Connor Cross1, Roman H Khonsari2, Dawid Larysz3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Scientific Reports
|October 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Finite element analysis models surgical outcomes for sagittal synostosis, a common craniosynostosis. This computational approach predicts skull shape and brain pressure, aiding in optimizing treatment for this condition.

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.6K
Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling
06:51

Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling

Published on: August 18, 2023

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

650
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.6K
Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling
06:51

Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling

Published on: August 18, 2023

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Biology
  • Pediatric Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Sagittal synostosis, the most common craniosynostosis, causes skull deformities and potential neurocognitive issues.
  • Current surgical techniques for correction are debated regarding optimal outcomes.
  • Finite element method (FEM) offers a computational approach to aid in craniosynostosis management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and predict the outcomes of three distinct surgical reconstruction methods for sagittal synostosis.
  • To simulate calvarial growth and assess the impact of different techniques on brain development.
  • To validate computational predictions against clinical data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a generic finite element model based on a 4-month-old patient.
  • Virtual reconstruction of the model using three different surgical techniques.
  • Simulation of calvarial growth up to 60 months of age.
  • Comparison of predicted morphology and brain pressure with in vivo and literature data.

Main Results:

  • Predicted skull morphology showed a promising resemblance to follow-up outcomes.
  • The study successfully captured morphological differences between the three reconstruction techniques.
  • Analysis of pressure distribution across the brain highlighted technique-specific impacts on growth.

Conclusions:

  • Finite element method is a valuable tool for predicting surgical outcomes in sagittal synostosis.
  • The study provides a foundation for investigating additional reconstructive techniques.
  • Optimizing craniosynostosis management through computational modeling is a key future direction.