Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The dual impact of irrelevant visual onsets: Habituation of capture unlocks onset facilitation.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Ignoring distractors takes its (memory) toll.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Perceptual Organization Facilitates Object-Based Distractor Filtering.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Anticipatory and reactive mechanisms of habituation to visual distractors.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Within-trial and across-trials habituation mechanisms to irrelevant visual transients.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Rejecting an irrelevant singleton in the absence of a competing target.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.0K

Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.

Matteo De Tommaso1, Massimo Turatto1

  • 1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trent, Italy.

British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|October 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Reward cues capture attention, even when detrimental. This study explores if attention capture is solely motivational or if other mechanisms are involved, and if cue attractiveness changes with reward value.

Keywords:
attentiondevaluationrewardsalienceselection history

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

596
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

596
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Motivational stimuli, particularly reward cues, significantly bias attention.
  • Existing research indicates attentional prioritization of reward cues, even when rewards cease or attention is counterproductive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying attentional capture by reward cues.
  • To determine if non-motivational factors contribute to cue-induced attention.
  • To examine the dynamic updating of cue attractiveness based on changing reward values.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on attention and motivation.
  • Analysis of studies employing various experimental paradigms to probe attentional bias.
  • Exploration of research addressing the plasticity of cue-reward associations.

Main Results:

  • Attentional salience of reward cues may be influenced by factors beyond direct motivation.
  • Limited research currently addresses the dynamic recalibration of cue attractiveness with fluctuating reward values.

Conclusions:

  • Further research is needed to differentiate motivational from other attention-capturing mechanisms.
  • Understanding how reward cue salience adapts to changing motivation is crucial for explaining attention biases.