Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
ClinicalTrials.gov as a Source of Information About Expanded Access Programs: Cohort Study
Jan Borysowski1,2, Andrzej Górski3
1Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov) offers incomplete data on expanded access programs, with missing details like contact information and eligibility criteria. Many U.S. expanded access studies are also not registered, limiting patient and provider access to crucial treatment information.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Informatics
- Health Services Research
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov) is a primary registry for clinical studies.
- Expanded access allows use of unapproved treatments outside trials.
- Information availability on expanded access programs is a significant challenge for patients and providers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate ClinicalTrials.gov as a comprehensive information source for expanded access programs.
- To assess the completeness of data within CT.gov for expanded access initiatives.
- To determine the registration rate of published expanded access studies on CT.gov.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 228 expanded access program records on CT.gov (Feb 2017-May 2020).
- Examination of the proportion of published US expanded access studies registered on CT.gov (2014-2019).
- Logistic regression and mediation analyses to identify predictors of missing information and non-registration.
Main Results:
- Significant data gaps identified in CT.gov records, including study descriptions (55.3%), facility information (54.0%), central contact (41.7%), and eligibility criteria (17.5%).
- Central contact information was more likely missing in earlier registrations (2017).
- Only 42.9% of published US expanded access studies were registered on CT.gov; no significant predictors of non-registration were found.
Conclusions:
- ClinicalTrials.gov currently provides a fragmented view of expanded access programs.
- The incompleteness of CT.gov data hinders access to vital information for healthcare providers and patients.
- Stakeholder actions are recommended to improve CT.gov's utility as a comprehensive resource for expanded access information.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers