Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers
Esther Bär1,2, Lennart Volz3, Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete1
1Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Purpose:
Measurements comparing relative stopping power (RSP) accuracy of state-of-the-art systems representing single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography (SECT/DECT) with proton CT (pCT) and helium CT (HeCT) in biological tissue samples.
Methods:
We used 16 porcine and bovine samples of various tissue types and water, covering an RSP range from 0.90 0.06 to 1.78 0.05. Samples were packed and sealed into 3D-printed cylinders ( cm, cm) and inserted into an in-house designed cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom ( cm, cm). We scanned the phantom in a commercial SECT and DECT (120 kV; 100 and 140 kV/Sn (tin-filtered)); and acquired pCT and HeCT ( MeV/u, 2 steps, (p)/ (He) particles/projection) with a particle imaging prototype. RSP maps were calculated from SECT/DECT using stoichiometric methods and from pCT/HeCT using the DROP-TVS algorithm. We estimated the average RSP of each tissue per modality in cylindrical volumes of interest and compared it to ground truth RSP taken from peak-detection measurements.
Results:
Throughout all samples, we observe the following root-mean-squared RSP prediction errors combined uncertainty from reference measurement and imaging: SECT 3.10 2.88%, DECT 0.75 2.80%, pCT 1.19 2.81%, and HeCT 0.78 2.81%. The largest mean errors combined uncertainty per modality are SECT 8.22 2.79% in cortical bone, DECT 1.74 2.00% in back fat, pCT 1.80 4.27% in bone marrow, and HeCT 1.37 4.25% in bone marrow. Ring artifacts were observed in both pCT and HeCT reconstructions, imposing a systematic shift to predicted RSPs.
Conclusion:
Comparing state-of-the-art SECT/DECT technology and a pCT/HeCT prototype, DECT provided the most accurate RSP prediction, closely followed by particle imaging. The novel modalities pCT and HeCT have the potential to further improve on RSP accuracies with work focusing on the origin and correction of ring artifacts. Future work will study accuracy of proton treatment plans using RSP maps from investigated imaging modalities.
More Related Videos
06:42Plasmonic Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Nanoparticle-embedded Tumor-tissue-mimicking Phantoms for Visualizing Photothermal Temperature Distribution
Published on: May 9, 2025
06:33Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography