Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Prevalence and prognostic value of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy as defined according to the proposed new classification
Maurizio Cesari1, Anna Chiara Frigo2, Salvatore Piano1
1Unit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Italy.
Insights
Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) affects 29% of patients, primarily due to altered global longitudinal strain (GLS). However, current criteria lack prognostic value for clinical management, suggesting a need for revised diagnostic approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hepatology
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a complex cardiac dysfunction in liver cirrhosis.
- The prevalence and prognostic significance of CCM, based on recent 2019 criteria, remain largely uncharacterized.
- Understanding CCM is crucial for managing cirrhotic patients, who often have co-existing cardiovascular issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) using the 2019 core criteria.
- To evaluate the prognostic relevance of CCM in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients.
- To assess the utility of current CCM diagnostic criteria in clinical management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 162 cirrhotic patients followed for at least 6 years.
- Standard Doppler echocardiography and speckle tracking analysis were performed.
- Assessment included left ventricular (LV) geometry, systolic/diastolic function, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and hemodynamic parameters.
Main Results:
- Echocardiographic analysis was feasible in 83 patients.
- The prevalence of CCM was 29%, primarily driven by altered resting global longitudinal strain (GLS).
- No significant differences in baseline characteristics or long-term outcomes (death, hepatorenal syndrome) were observed between patients with and without CCM.
Conclusions:
- The 2019 criteria for CCM identify a significant prevalence (29%) but lack prognostic relevance in cirrhotic patients.
- Current CCM diagnostic criteria, including LV ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment, appear insufficient for clinical management.
- Modification of criteria, incorporating stress testing for cardiac contractile reserve, is proposed to improve prognostic accuracy.
Aim Of The Study:
Prevalence and prognostic relevance of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), as defined according to the new core criteria proposed in 2019, are still unknown. We investigated this relevant issue in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients.
Material And Methods:
We retrospectively interrogated a data set of 162 collected cirrhotic patients followed up for at least 6 years, who underwent standard Doppler echocardiography and were compared with 46 healthy subjects. Left ventricular (LV) geometry, systo-diastolic function, global longitudinal strain and the main hemodynamic parameters were assessed according to current guidelines. Systolic dysfunction was diagnosed if LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% and/or global longitudinal strain (GLS) < 18% or > 22%.
Results:
Adequate echocardiographic images permitting speckle tracking analysis were available in 83 patients. No patient presented LVEF ≤ 50%, GLS < 18% or > 22% was evident in 25%, advanced diastolic dysfunction was evident in 10%. Overall the prevalence of CCM was 29%. Patients with and without CCM presented similar clinical, biochemical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic features at baseline and similar incidence of death or type 1 hepatorenal syndrome at follow-up.
Conclusions:
According to the new criteria CCM is detected in 29%, mainly due to altered GLS at rest, but without prognostic relevance and therefore useless for the clinical management of cirrhotic patients. We propose to modify the criteria by removing the LVEF assessment and adding also a stress test assessing the cardiac contractile reserve to distinguish patients with a blunted cardiac response, which could present a worst prognosis.
More Related Videos
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
07:32Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care