Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the Potential of Ambient AI for Inpatient Documentation: A Qualitative Study with Junior Doctors.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same author

Surgical site infections in the returning medical tourist: bridging the knowledge gap and identifying areas for improvement.

The Journal of hospital infection·2026
Same author

Few FDA Approved AI/ML Orthopaedic Devices Have EU MDR Equivalents or Peer-Reviewed Validation.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same author

AI in patient education: a comparative analysis of the quality and readability of AI generated patient education material on spinal fusion.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2025
Same author

Ambient AI reduces documentation time and enhances quality in a simulated inpatient setting.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2025
Same author

2025 ICM: Surgical Procedure Time.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
06:16

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy

Published on: May 1, 2020

5.7K

A Portable Hip Arthroscopy Simulator Demonstrates Good Face and Content Validity with Incomplete Construct Validity.

Aoife Feeley1,2, Luke Turley1, Eoin Sheehan1,2

  • 1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Tullamore Hospital, Arden, Road, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Ireland.

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
|October 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This hip arthroscopy simulator shows good face and content validity. Adding haptic feedback could improve skill assessment and learning for surgeons.

More Related Videos

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
06:16

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy

Published on: May 1, 2020

5.7K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Surgical Simulation
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Hip arthroscopy is a complex procedure requiring specialized training.
  • Simulation offers a safe environment for developing surgical skills.
  • Evaluating the validity of surgical simulators is crucial for their effective implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the face, content, and construct validity of a portable hip arthroscopy simulator.
  • To determine if simulator metrics can differentiate between surgical experience levels.

Main Methods:

  • Orthopaedic surgeons (novice, intermediate, expert) used a hip arthroscopy simulator.
  • Face and content validity were assessed via user feedback.
  • Objective metrics (time, scope strikes, bone burred) and software metrics were recorded.
  • Expert performance defined the proficiency benchmark.

Main Results:

  • The simulator demonstrated good face and content validity among experienced users.
  • The number of scope strikes effectively distinguished between novice and expert groups.
  • Overall performance scores did not significantly differ across experience levels, indicating incomplete construct validity.
  • Participants reported high satisfaction and suggested haptic feedback.

Conclusions:

  • The hip arthroscopy simulator has acceptable face and content validity.
  • Simulator software metrics require refinement for complete construct validity.
  • Haptic feedback integration may enhance skill differentiation and learning outcomes.