Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Quantifying Fitness Costs in Transgenic Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes
Published on: September 15, 2023
Future Offspring Costs in Economic Evaluation
Evelyn Verbeke1, Jeroen Luyten2
1Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. evelyn.verbeke@kuleuven.be.
Insights
Future healthcare costs should include offspring impacts, but only for necessary lives. This approach avoids skewed economic evaluations for fertility-affecting interventions and addresses a gap in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Population Ethics
- Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
Background:
- Current economic evaluation guidelines recommend including all future costs.
- A significant dimension of future costs, related to offspring, is systematically neglected.
- Healthcare interventions can influence patient fertility and future offspring health, incurring substantial costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the neglect of future offspring costs in economic evaluations.
- To propose a framework for including relevant future offspring costs in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
- To address the ethical and methodological challenges of incorporating these costs.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of economic evaluation guidelines and their implications for future costs.
- Application of the population ethics concept of necessitarianism.
- Distinguishing between costs associated with 'necessary' versus 'potential' future lives.
Main Results:
- Future offspring costs can be substantial and vary across interventions and demographics.
- Systematic inclusion of all future offspring costs presents significant methodological problems.
- Applying necessitarianism allows exclusion of costs from 'potential' lives, avoiding skewed outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Future generations represent a substantial gap in current Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodology.
- The proposed approach using necessitarianism offers a pragmatic way to account for necessary future costs.
- Further discussion is needed to refine HTA methodology regarding the economic implications for future generations.
Abstract:
Economic evaluation guidelines increasingly prescribe inclusion of all future costs. We point at an important dimension of future costs that is systematically neglected. Healthcare can affect future offspring, either through affecting the patient's fertility or through determining future offspring's health. As we show, the future costs associated with these changes can be substantial and will vary across interventions and demographic groups. However, systematic inclusion of these future offspring costs would raise many problems on its own. Based on the population ethics concept of necessitarianism, we suggest that only those future costs that spring from 'necessary' future lives should be included in future cost calculations, while all costs associated with 'potential' future lives can be ignored. This approach allows excluding most future offspring costs and avoids skewed cost-effectiveness outcomes of interventions with fertility effects, while taking into account the economic implications of preventing disease in future generations that will exist by necessity. Overall, future generations expose a substantial gap in today's Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodology and further discussion of the issues they raise is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Budgets
Probability Laws
Life Histories
Population Growth
Nondisjunction
Inclusive Fitness

