Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
Comparing shallow, deep, and transfer learning in predicting joint moments in running
Bernard X W Liew1, David Rügamer2, Xiaojun Zhai3
1School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom.
Machine learning models, particularly deep neural networks (DNNs), can accurately predict joint moments during running using only kinematic data. This approach overcomes limitations of traditional biomechanics lab measurements.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Machine Learning
- Sports Science
Background:
- Joint moments are crucial for understanding muscle behavior and joint loading in biomechanics.
- Quantifying joint moments clinically or in the field is challenging due to difficulties in measuring ground reaction forces outside laboratory settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of three machine learning (ML) techniques—functional regression (MLfregress), a deep neural network (MLDNN), and transfer learning (MLTL)—in predicting joint moments during running.
- To evaluate the potential of ML models using kinematic data to overcome current biomechanics data acquisition constraints.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an open-source dataset and data from two running studies with and without external loads.
- Derived 3D joint moments (hip, knee, ankle) via inverse dynamics.
- Employed 3D joint angle, velocity, and acceleration as predictors for MLfregress, an ML DNN built from scratch, and MLTL.
Main Results:
- Prediction performance was highest with ML_DNN and lowest with ML_fregress.
- The best absolute predictive performance was observed for sagittal plane moments, with RMSE values ranging from 0.16 Nm/kg (ankle, ML_DNN) to 0.49 Nm/kg (knee, ML_fregress).
- ML_DNN demonstrated a 20% improvement in relative prediction performance (relRMSE) for ankle adduction-abduction moments compared to ML_fregress.
Conclusions:
- Deep neural networks (DNNs), with or without transfer learning, significantly outperformed functional regression in predicting joint moments using kinematic inputs.
- Integrating ML with kinematic data offers a promising solution for obtaining high-fidelity biomechanics data outside traditional laboratory environments.
More Related Videos
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
11:18Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
Published on: June 1, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Principle of Moments: Problem Solving
One such scenario involves a pole placed in a three-dimensional system with a cable attached. When a tension is applied to the cable, the moment about the z-axis passing through...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Principle of Moments
The moment is calculated by multiplying the magnitude of the force by the perpendicular distance from the point of application to the point about...
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...