Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Interpreting plural predication: homogeneity and non-maximality
Manuel Križ1, Benjamin Spector2
1Department of Linguistics, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
This study introduces a new theory for understanding plural definite descriptions, explaining their exceptions and interpretations in sentences. The research offers a unified account for complex linguistic phenomena involving quantifiers and negation.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Semantics
- Formal Semantics
Background:
- Plural definite descriptions exhibit non-maximal readings (allowing exceptions) and homogeneity (existential interpretation under negation).
- Previous theories by Krifka (1996) and Malamud (2012) provide foundational insights but face limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel theory of plural definite descriptions that accounts for their varied interpretations.
- To address limitations of existing theories and provide a more comprehensive analysis.
Main Methods:
- Building upon prior semantic and pragmatic frameworks.
- Developing a theory where sentences with plural definites yield a range of interpretations.
- Utilizing general principles of language use to explain contextual and syntactic variations.
Main Results:
- The proposed theory successfully resolves issues encountered in previous works.
- It offers precise analyses for complex interactions involving plural definites, quantifiers, and bound variables.
- The theory also accounts for sentences with non-distributive predicates.
Conclusions:
- The new theory provides a unified and broader account of plural definite descriptions.
- It offers a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of their semantic behavior across different linguistic contexts.
- The proposal is compared with alternative theories, highlighting its unique predictions and strengths.
Related Concept Videos
Test for Homogeneity
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
Second Uniqueness Theorem
In contrast, consider that the electric field is non-unique and apply Gauss's law in divergence form in the region between the conductors and the integral form to the...
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle

