Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.8K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

16.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
16.5K
Bias01:22

Bias

6.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.3K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

177
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
177
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

16.6K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.6K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

14.6K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
14.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychological Reserve/External Psychological Control in Psychotherapy: Review and New Models.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Redefining Representativeness of a Sample in Causal Terms.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025
Same author

Causal Conditionals, Tendency Causal Claims and Statistical Relevance.

Review of philosophy and psychology·2025
Same author

Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View.

Foundations of science·2024
Same author

Expert opinions on implementation of MDMA-assisted therapy in Europe: critical appraisal towards training, clinical practice, and regulation.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2024
Same author

A Bayesian perspective on severity: risky predictions and specific hypotheses.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.1K

Objectivity for the research worker.

Noah van Dongen1, Michał Sikorski2,3

  • 1University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

European Journal for Philosophy of Science
|November 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Scientific misconduct stems from a lack of objectivity. This study proposes a novel, negative, and dynamic approach to scientific objectivity, offering practical tools for scientists to assess and improve their research practices.

Keywords:
BiasFalse-positive rateObjectivityReplication crisis

More Related Videos

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.1K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.1K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.1K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific Integrity
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Recent decades reveal numerous scientific misconduct cases, ranging from fraud to subtle biases.
  • Existing philosophical theories of objectivity lack practical application for scientists.
  • Problems in scientific conduct are often linked to a deficit in scientific objectivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel, empirically informed conceptualization of scientific objectivity for individual scientists.
  • To develop a practical framework for identifying factors that undermine scientific practice.
  • To create a negative conceptualization of objectivity (what is not objective) for self-assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis informed by empirical research on scientific conduct.
  • Compilation of an inventory of factors impairing scientific practice.
  • Development of a preliminary outline for a usable and testable instrument to assess objectivity.

Main Results:

  • A novel negative and dynamic conceptualization of scientific objectivity is proposed.
  • An inventory of factors that negatively impact scientific objectivity is being compiled.
  • A preliminary instrument for assessing deviations from scientific objectivity is outlined.

Conclusions:

  • Current objectivity theories are insufficient for practical scientific application.
  • A negative, dynamic, and empirically informed approach offers a viable path to enhance scientific objectivity.
  • The proposed framework and instrument aim to empower individual scientists in maintaining research integrity.