Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Intermediate- vs. Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted in Medical Ward: A
David M Smadja1,2,3, Guillaume Bonnet4,5, Nicolas Gendron1,2
1Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Insights
Intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (AC) did not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients compared to standard-dose AC. This study found no difference in mortality or thrombotic events between the two anticoagulant regimens.
Area of Science:
- * Internal Medicine
- * Critical Care Medicine
- * Pharmacology
Background:
- * Microthrombosis and large-vessel thrombosis are key factors in COVID-19 severity.
- * The optimal anticoagulant strategy for hospitalized COVID-19 patients remains undetermined.
- * This study addresses the need for evidence-based anticoagulant regimens in non-ICU COVID-19 patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To compare the efficacy of intermediate-dose versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation.
- * To evaluate the impact on in-hospital mortality and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients.
- * To determine the optimal anticoagulant regimen for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in medical wards.
Main Methods:
- * A retrospective analysis of 2,878 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in French medical wards.
- * Propensity-score matching was used to create comparable cohorts for intermediate-dose (n=261) and standard-dose (n=763) prophylactic anticoagulation.
- * In-hospital mortality and thrombotic events were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.
Main Results:
- * In-hospital mortality rates were similar: 8.8% for intermediate-dose AC and 9.4% for standard-dose AC (p=0.85).
- * Time to death was comparable between groups (11.5 vs. 11.6 days, p=0.17).
- * No significant differences were observed in venous or arterial thrombotic events between the two AC doses.
Conclusions:
- * Intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation offers no significant mortality benefit over standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
- * The study found no significant difference in thrombotic events between the two prophylactic anticoagulation strategies.
- * Current evidence suggests standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation is sufficient for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in medical wards.
Abstract:
Background: Microthrombosis and large-vessel thrombosis are the main triggers of COVID-19 worsening. The optimal anticoagulant regimen in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in medical wards remains unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs. standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (AC) among patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in medical wards. Methods and results: We used a large French multicentric retrospective study enrolling 2,878 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in medical wards. After exclusion of patients who had an AC treatment before hospitalization, we generated a propensity-score-matched cohort of patients who were treated with intermediate-dose or standard-dose prophylactic AC between February 26 and April 20, 2020 (intermediate-dose, n = 261; standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, n = 763). The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality; this occurred in 23 of 261 (8.8%) patients in the intermediate-dose group and 74 of 783 (9.4%) patients in the standard-dose prophylactic AC group (p = 0.85); while time to death was also the same in both the treatment groups (11.5 and 11.6 days, respectively, p = 0.17). We did not observe any difference regarding venous and arterial thrombotic events between the intermediate dose and standard dose, respectively (venous thrombotic events: 2.3 vs. 2.4%, p=0.99; arterial thrombotic events: 2.7 vs. 1.2%, p = 0.25). The 30-day Kaplan-Meier curves for in-hospital mortality demonstrate no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality (HR: 0.99 (0.63-1.60); p = 0.99). Moreover, we found that no particular subgroup was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Among COVID-19 patients hospitalized in medical wards, intermediate-dose prophylactic AC compared with standard-dose prophylactic AC did not result in a significant difference in in-hospital mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

