Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Does the Duncan-Ely test predict abnormal activity of the rectus femoris in stroke survivors with a stiff knee gait?
Martin J B Tenniglo1, Marc J Nederhand, Judith F Fleuren
1Roessingh Research and Development,PO Box 310, 7500 AH Enschede, The Netherlands. . m.tenniglo@rrd.nl.
Objective:
To determine the diagnostic value of the Duncan-Ely test in predicting abnormal rectus femoris activity during gait in stroke survivors walking with a stiff knee gait.
Design:
Cross-sectional diagnostic study.
Subjects:
A total of 95 patients with chronic stroke.
Methods:
During physical examination, the Duncan-Ely test was performed and scored. Surface electromyography of the rectus femoris was then recorded during dynamic gait. To determine the diagnostic value, the results of the Duncan-Ely test and surface electromyography recordings (gold standard) were compared.
Results:
The Duncan-Ely test had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 29%, a positive predictive value of 60%, and a negative predictive value of 42%. The area under the curve was 0.488 ([AQ1] CI 0.355-0.621, p = 0.862), showing that the Duncan-Ely test is not better than random guessing.
Conclusion:
The Duncan-Ely test has no predictive value for determining abnormal activity of the rectus femoris during gait. Using this test can lead to incorrect identification of abnormal rectus femoris activity, which might hamper the selection of optimal treatment options. We recommend stopping use of the Duncan-Ely test to predict rectus femoris overactivity during swing, and instead use surface electromyography.
More Related Videos
09:10Determining the Functional Status of the Corticospinal Tract Within One Week of Stroke
Published on: February 22, 2020
08:55Use of a Foot-Induced Digitally Controlled Resistance Device for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Patients with Foot Paresis
Published on: July 7, 2023