Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

OP-IVM: Combining In vitro Maturation after Oocyte Retrieval with Gynecological Surgery
Published on: May 9, 2021
Expectant Management Before In vitro Fertilization in Women Aged 39 or Above and Unexplained Infertility Does Not
Andrea Roberto Carosso1, Rik van Eekelen2, Alberto Revelli3
1Obstetrics and Gynecology 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 1, 10126, Turin, Italy. andrea88.carosso@gmail.com.
A waiting list for assisted reproductive treatments did not significantly impact live birth rates for unexplained infertility. This suggests expectant management may be suitable for some couples, regardless of immediate or delayed in vitro fertilization (IVF) access.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Infertility Research
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Unexplained infertility affects many couples, with expectant management often considered before assisted reproductive treatments.
- Advanced maternal age (≥39 years) is associated with declining ovarian reserve and in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates.
- The appropriateness of waiting policies for older women undergoing fertility treatments requires clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the live birth rates between couples with unexplained infertility who opted for immediate IVF treatment versus those utilizing a waiting list for public, reimbursed IVF.
- To determine if a waiting policy is a suitable strategy for women of advanced reproductive age experiencing unexplained infertility.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study comparing two groups of couples with unexplained infertility: one group accessing immediate, self-funded IVF and another group on a public IVF waiting list (approx. 1 year).
- Follow-up was conducted for 1 year after the last embryo transfer of the first IVF cycle.
- Cumulative live birth rates (cLBR) were calculated and compared using logistic regression and a two-sample Z test for equality of proportions.
Main Results:
- A total of 635 couples were evaluated (359 immediate group, 276 waiting group).
- The crude cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) was similar between the immediate group (19.5%) and the waiting group (20.7%).
- Logistic regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference in live birth rates between the two strategies, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.39-1.22).
Conclusions:
- The study found no statistically significant difference in cumulative live birth rates between immediate IVF access and a waiting list strategy for couples with unexplained infertility.
- These findings suggest that a waiting policy may be a viable option for some couples, even for women of advanced reproductive age.
- Further research is recommended to individualize infertility treatment strategies based on specific couple characteristics.
More Related Videos
08:46Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
08:06Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality
Published on: October 18, 2024
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Infertility in Males
Meiosis II
Oogenesis
Birth Control Methods