Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

5.4K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.4K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

60.0K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
60.0K
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations01:30

Spontaneous and Induced Mutations

311
Spontaneous mutations arise infrequently during DNA replication due to errors in the process. A key factor behind these errors is tautomeric shifts in nitrogenous bases, where bases transition from keto to enol forms or amino to imino forms. This shift can alter base-pairing rules, leading to mutations. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) arising from aerobic metabolism can damage DNA, resulting in depurination (loss of a purine base) or depyrimidination (loss of a pyrimidine base).
311
Mutations01:35

Mutations

41.3K
Mutations are changes in the sequence of DNA. These changes can occur spontaneously or they can be induced by exposure to environmental factors. Mutations can be characterized in a number of different ways: whether and how they alter the amino acid sequence of the protein, whether they occur over a small or large area of DNA, and whether they occur in somatic cells or germline cells.
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
41.3K
Point and Frameshift Mutations01:30

Point and Frameshift Mutations

259
Point mutations are genetic alterations involving the change of a single nucleotide base pair in DNA. Depending on how the alteration affects protein synthesis, they can lead to various consequences.Point mutations fall into the following types:Silent mutations occur when a nucleotide change does not alter the amino acid sequence due to the redundancy of the genetic code. For instance, changing ACC to ACA still encodes threonine, leaving the protein function unaffected. This occurs because...
259
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

228
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
228

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Establishment of non-integrate induced pluripotent stem cell line CSUASOi013-A, from peripheral blood-derived cells of a PRPF31-related dominant retinitis pigmentosa patient.

Stem cell research·2026
Same author

An optimization framework for hierarchical clustering.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

Establishment of CSUASOi014-A, an induced pluripotent stem cell line from blood-derived cells of a Chinese patient carrying PRPF31 gene mutation.

Stem cell research·2026
Same author

Impact of reducing the duration of fasting and no drinking on the experiences of older patients receiving painless gastroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Toward identification of common DNA repair process in mutational signatures.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Unifying proteomic technologies with ProteinProjector.

Bioinformatics advances·2025
Same journal

De novo variants in NPTN cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with autism and neuroplastin-PMCA hypofunction.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Dual functional genomics reveals a broad and convergent landscape of asciminib resistance in BCR::ABL1.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

ESR1 mutations and CDK4/6 inhibitor choice shape clonal selection and adaptive cell states during acquired resistance.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Cell type-specific contextualisation of the human phenome: towards the systematic treatment of all rare diseases.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Tumor-naïve ctDNA detection with deep learning-enhanced error suppression for sensitive mutation calling.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Microbial cell-free DNA for rapid pathogen identification in clinical diagnostics: a proof of concept study.

Genome medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K

A mixture model for signature discovery from sparse mutation data.

Itay Sason1, Yuexi Chen2, Mark D M Leiserson2

  • 1Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel.

Genome Medicine
|November 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Analyzing sparse cancer genome data is challenging. A new mixture model, Mix, accurately identifies mutational signatures and patient groups from limited gene sequencing data, outperforming existing methods.

Keywords:
Gene panel sequencingMutational signaturesProbabilistic modeling

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.2K
Characterizing Mutational Load and Clonal Composition of Human Blood
07:58

Characterizing Mutational Load and Clonal Composition of Human Blood

Published on: July 11, 2019

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.2K
Characterizing Mutational Load and Clonal Composition of Human Blood
07:58

Characterizing Mutational Load and Clonal Composition of Human Blood

Published on: July 11, 2019

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Cancer Research
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Mutational signatures are crucial for understanding cancer genome evolution.
  • Analysis typically requires extensive whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing data.
  • Clinically available gene-panel sequencing data is often sparse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational method for analyzing sparse gene-panel sequencing data.
  • To accurately identify mutational signatures and stratify cancer patients using limited mutation data.
  • To demonstrate the utility of the proposed method in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a novel mixture model named Mix.
  • Application and evaluation of Mix on simulated and real gene-panel sequencing data.
  • Comparison of Mix's performance against existing approaches.

Main Results:

  • Mix significantly outperforms current methods in analyzing sparse mutation data.
  • The model successfully identifies mutational signatures and patient stratifications consistent with existing literature.
  • Mix demonstrates efficacy in predicting therapy benefits and patient groupings from clinical pan-cancer data.

Conclusions:

  • The Mix model offers a powerful new approach for mutational signature analysis using sparse sequencing data.
  • This method enhances the clinical utility of gene-panel sequencing for cancer research and patient stratification.
  • Mix provides a valuable tool for uncovering cancer genome processes even with limited data.